Re: anti-gravity? [OT]

On a sunny day (Mon, 22 Apr 2024 08:27:32 +0100) it happened
liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) wrote in
<1qsepmy.1igbph81ebujn0N%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid>:

jim whitby <news@spockmail.net> wrote:
>

Looking for opinion of persons better educatrd than myself.
 
<https://thedebrief.org/nasa-veterans-propellantless-propulsion-drive-
that-physics-says-shouldnt-work-just-produced-enough-thrust-to-defeat-
earths-gravity/>

>
Has anyone come across the alternative theory of gravity which I first
heard of from P.G.A.H. Voigt?
>
It suggests that the current theory of gravity is rather like the idea
we used to have that there was force 'due to vacuum', rather than air
pressure.  It proposes that the real cause of the gravitational effects
we observe is not an attraction but a pressure.
>
The concept is that a force acts on all bodies equally in all dirctions.
When two bodies with mass approach each other, each shields the other
from some of this force and the remaining forces propel the bodies
towards each other.
>
I don't know how it would be possible to test whether this was in fact
how 'gravity' worked and whether it was possible to differentiate it
from the current theory, as the two would appear to have identical
observed effects.

I still go with this:
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_Sage%27s_theory_of_gravitation#
It is predictive as to time deletion,
clocks / pendulums/ atoms/ get less compressed where particles are intercepted like close to a planet
it predicts internal heating of heavenly bodies
It challenges Albert's babble...
and a few more things..
If you could make a machine that would let those particles through in only one direction
then you _have_ a propulsion system.
It does away with all the infinities in 'singularities' as there is a point where all particles would be stopped
by an object.
Also if EM radiation is a form (state) of those LS particles then light travels at the speed of gravity (seems to have been observed)
Once you question where those LS particles originate and that could be in stars or [black] holes,
or in other bangs of which there must be trillions, then the universe would expand ever faster as observed.
I am open to a better theory but this checks all boxes and gets rid of silly parroting Albert Stone Counter.
Interesting is questions  like do those particles have chirality and the effect it has on those particles passing through matter.
Superconducting chiral propeller?
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_Podkletnov

There is much more.
Last few hundred years humming beans discovered 'radio and electronics'
learned to drive in cars, steam engines, fly airplanes,
Thousands of years ago leaned to make and use 'fire'
Looks almost exponential.
OTOH just a bit of mutual nuking and we are back to wood fires, or go dino's way.
Must be happening all over the universes (yes more than one).
Maybe that cosmic microwave background is the sum of all them alien's radio and TV transmissions...
We are just a few neurons in a very very very large 'space?'
Lots to discover I'm sure. And limits we have, or are we connected to it all and know it all..