Re: anti-gravity?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: anti-gravity?
De : '''newspam''' (at) *nospam* nonad.co.uk (Martin Brown)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 22. Apr 2024, 14:07:45
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v05juj$uhqg$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 21/04/2024 16:20, Joe Gwinn wrote:
On Sun, 21 Apr 2024 13:35:27 +0100, Martin Brown
<'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> wrote:
 
On 21/04/2024 01:11, Phil Hobbs wrote:
John Larkin <jjSNIPlarkin@highNONOlandtechnology.com> wrote:
On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 23:31:19 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs
<pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
>
jim whitby <news@spockmail.net> wrote:
On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 23:19:30 -0000 (UTC), jim whitby wrote:
>
Looking for opinion of persons better educatrd than myself.
I do know how to spell... most of the time. educatded
>
>
.<https://thedebrief.org/nasa-veterans-propellantless-propulsion-drive-
that-physics-says-shouldnt-work-just-produced-enough-thrust-to-defeat-
earths-gravity/>
>
Then it should float in mid-air, or accelerate upward. So why does it
need to be tested in space?
 Vacuum to get rid of corona.
There are space vehicle qualifying hard vacuum facilities on the ground. If this thing can generate 1g it could levitate inside there.
 Space (orbit really) so tiny forces can be detected and measured.
The guy claims 1g acceleration. 1g of continuous acceleration is enough to reach the centre of our galaxy in about 20 years if memory serves.

A steady one G acceleration would be pretty impressive, and would
settle the issue.
I might believe 1 G (as in the gravitational constant ie thermal noise) but not 1g acceleration due to gravity at the Earth's surface.
That fellow reminds me of the inventor I met, described in the SED
thread "Non-Inertial Navigation Technology" (July 2020).  That company
still exists, and he still toils away.  I don't know where the money
comes from.
As always from gullible suckers with more money than sense. The most successful recent high profile scam took in a lot of experienced investors who should have known better or employed people who did. Elizabeth Holmes at Theranos managed to almost pull it off too.
https://news.sky.com/story/elizabeth-holmes-former-chief-executive-of-blood-testing-startup-theranos-found-guilty-of-fraud-12508609
But if you want a real example of how to do it big time then the vanishing OneCoin crypto queen has to be it.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-64407723
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/crime/cryptoqueen-ruja-ignatova-fugitive-greenwood-b2414415.html
A successful $4bn scam is very impressive! FOMO drives these bubbles.
--
Martin Brown

Date Sujet#  Auteur
21 Apr 24 * anti-gravity?50jim whitby
21 Apr 24 +* Re: anti-gravity?28jim whitby
21 Apr 24 i+* Re: anti-gravity?21Phil Hobbs
21 Apr 24 ii+* Re: anti-gravity?19John Larkin
21 Apr 24 iii+* Re: anti-gravity?15Phil Hobbs
21 Apr 24 iiii`* Re: anti-gravity?14Martin Brown
21 Apr 24 iiii +* Re: anti-gravity?12Joe Gwinn
21 Apr 24 iiii i+* Re: anti-gravity?2Phil Hobbs
21 Apr 24 iiii ii`- Re: anti-gravity?1Joe Gwinn
22 Apr 24 iiii i+* Re: anti-gravity?2John Larkin
22 Apr 24 iiii ii`- Re: anti-gravity?1Joe Gwinn
22 Apr 24 iiii i`* Re: anti-gravity?7Martin Brown
22 Apr 24 iiii i `* Re: anti-gravity?6Jeff Layman
23 Apr 24 iiii i  `* Re: anti-gravity?5Martin Brown
23 Apr 24 iiii i   +- Re: anti-gravity?1Jan Panteltje
24 Apr 24 iiii i   `* Re: anti-gravity?3Jan Panteltje
24 Apr 24 iiii i    `* Re: anti-gravity?2Martin Brown
24 Apr 24 iiii i     `- Re: anti-gravity?1Jan Panteltje
22 Apr 24 iiii `- Re: anti-gravity?1John R Walliker
21 Apr 24 iii`* Re: anti-gravity?3jim whitby
21 Apr 24 iii `* Re: anti-gravity?2Jeff Layman
21 Apr 24 iii  `- Re: anti-gravity?1Bill Sloman
22 Apr 24 ii`- Re: anti-gravity?1Clive Arthur
22 Apr 24 i`* Re: anti-gravity?6Martin Brown
22 Apr 24 i `* Re: anti-gravity?5wmartin
22 Apr 24 i  `* Re: anti-gravity?4John Larkin
22 Apr 24 i   +* Re: anti-gravity?2Phil Hobbs
22 Apr 24 i   i`- Re: anti-gravity?1John Larkin
23 Apr 24 i   `- Re: anti-gravity?1Martin Brown
21 Apr 24 +- Re: anti-gravity?1ehsjr
22 Apr 24 `* Re: anti-gravity? [OT]20Liz Tuddenham
22 Apr 24  +* Re: anti-gravity? [OT]3Jan Panteltje
22 Apr 24  i`* Re: anti-gravity? [OT]2Liz Tuddenham
22 Apr 24  i `- Re: anti-gravity? [OT]1Bill Sloman
22 Apr 24  `* Re: anti-gravity? [OT]16Phil Hobbs
22 Apr 24   +* Re: anti-gravity? [OT]5John Larkin
22 Apr 24   i+- Re: anti-gravity? [OT]1bitrex
23 Apr 24   i+- Re: anti-gravity? [OT]1Bill Sloman
23 Apr 24   i`* Re: anti-gravity? [OT]2Martin Brown
23 Apr 24   i `- Re: anti-gravity? [OT]1bitrex
22 Apr 24   +* Re: anti-gravity? [OT]6Liz Tuddenham
22 Apr 24   i+* Re: anti-gravity? [OT]2Phil Hobbs
22 Apr 24   ii`- Re: anti-gravity? [OT]1Liz Tuddenham
24 Apr 24   i`* Re: anti-gravity? [OT]3John Larkin
24 Apr 24   i `* Re: anti-gravity? [OT]2Martin Brown
24 Apr 24   i  `- Re: anti-gravity? [OT]1John Larkin
22 Apr 24   `* Re: anti-gravity? [OT]4Jeroen Belleman
22 Apr 24    +* Re: anti-gravity? [OT]2Joe Gwinn
22 Apr 24    i`- Re: anti-gravity? [OT]1Jeroen Belleman
23 Apr 24    `- Re: anti-gravity? [OT]1Jan Panteltje

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal