Re: anti-gravity?

On Sun, 21 Apr 2024 15:06:19 -0700, John Larkin
<jjSNIPlarkin@highNONOlandtechnology.com> wrote:

On Sun, 21 Apr 2024 11:20:53 -0400, Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net>
wrote:
>

On Sun, 21 Apr 2024 13:35:27 +0100, Martin Brown
<'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> wrote:
>

On 21/04/2024 01:11, Phil Hobbs wrote:

John Larkin <jjSNIPlarkin@highNONOlandtechnology.com> wrote:

On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 23:31:19 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs
<pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
>

jim whitby <news@spockmail.net> wrote:

On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 23:19:30 -0000 (UTC), jim whitby wrote:
>

Looking for opinion of persons better educatrd than myself.

I do know how to spell... most of the time. educatded
>

>
.<https://thedebrief.org/nasa-veterans-propellantless-propulsion-drive-

that-physics-says-shouldnt-work-just-produced-enough-thrust-to-defeat-
earths-gravity/>

>
Then it should float in mid-air, or accelerate upward. So why does it
need to be tested in space?

>
Vacuum to get rid of corona.

>
>
So the failure can be blamed on the Farnsworth multipactor effect.

I suppose so, but he was talking of corona in much higher air
pressures than multipactors require.  Think corona as seen around HV
lines.

Joe Gwinn