Re: anti-gravity?

On a sunny day (Tue, 23 Apr 2024 09:59:13 +0100) it happened Martin Brown
<'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> wrote in <v07t91$1hhhe$1@dont-email.me>:

On 22/04/2024 22:20, Jeff Layman wrote:

On 22/04/2024 13:07, Martin Brown wrote:
 

The guy claims 1g acceleration. 1g of continuous acceleration is enough
to reach the centre of our galaxy in about 20 years if memory serves.

 
20 years?! I think there's a "k" missing. According to
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milky_Way#Sun's_location_and_neighborhood>, the sun is 26 - 27 kly from the centre of the
galaxy.
 
Or are you proposing FTL speeds?

>
20 years in the rest frame of the individual travelling there with
continuous acceleration of 1g.
>
Obviously the stay at home twin will be long dead by then.

I think that whole relatitvitty shit is wrong
Onestone likely got this from his wife it seems she was a mamatician

Without a mechanism it is all mamamatical crap.
Just like Ohm's law without electrons.
Broke down in a bad way when Fleming came up with a current in a vacuum tube.

Onestone is the hero of the jewish genocide committing club.
A bunch of brainwashed kids that are now brainwashing science.

In a Le Sage theory if you go ever faster at one point the particles from behind have zero speed
and the ones you face in front hit you with double light speed.
That leads to assymetry in 3 D (even in 2D)
and to state clocks / time changes in the way relatitvitty math says it does, is wrong.

Your nose gets shorter and your ears keep the same distance from each other?
Seems to me things cancel to a point, past lightspeed it get even more interesting.
Come on, ditch Onestone and try reasoning from a particle POV for a change.

Spectral spreading! Electron orbits not round but flattened in one direction...
Simple