Sujet : Re: Practical resistor accuracy distribution
De : bill.sloman (at) *nospam* ieee.org (Bill Sloman)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 28. Apr 2024, 06:00:01
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v0khk2$rmk5$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 28/04/2024 7:53 am, John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 27 Apr 2024 17:41:10 -0400, Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net>wrote
On Sat, 27 Apr 2024 14:24:43 -0700, John Larkin <jjSNIPlarkin@highNONOlandtechnology.com> wrote:
On Sat, 27 Apr 2024 16:47:29 -0400, Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net> wrote:
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 19:38:07 -0700, John Larkin <jjSNIPlarkin@highNONOlandtechnology.com> wrote:
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 20:16:48 -0400, Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net> wrote:
On Sat, 27 Apr 2024 00:54:41 +0200, Klaus Vestergaard Kragelund <klauskvik@hotmail.com> wrote:
One could cal out tempcos, but test time would be outrageous.
We are bidding on one unit that might need that. Yuk. The alternative
is to, basically, ovenize the PCB.
Top-end crystal oscillators have been relying on that for decades now.
Peltier junctions let you stabilise the board temperature close to room temperature, which can reduce long term drift.
-- Bill Sloman, Sydney
Practical resistor accuracy distribution
Re: Practical resistor accuracy distribution
