Sujet : Re: CCFL transformer
De : bill.sloman (at) *nospam* ieee.org (Bill Sloman)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 28. Apr 2024, 17:27:45
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v0lptl$1464n$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 29/04/2024 12:00 am, John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 27 Apr 2024 23:51:14 +0200, Klaus Vestergaard Kragelund <klauskvik@hotmail.com> wrote:
On 27-04-2024 19:17, legg wrote:
On Sat, 27 Apr 2024 01:26:09 +1000, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:
On 27/04/2024 12:24 am, legg wrote:
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 01:36:06 +1000, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:
On 26/04/2024 12:52 am, legg wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 01:57:36 +0200, Klaus Vestergaard Kragelund <klauskvik@hotmail.com> wrote:
<snip>
Books can inspire ideas, but it's more fun (and more profitable) to
invent circuits that aren't in books.
Of course most of them don't work, and of those that do work quite a few have unexpected gotcha's.
I think it's best to look at the books *after* thinking about the
problem for a few days.
It's two way street. Think first, so that you have some idea where the problems are so, that when you do read you are on the look-out for solutions to those problems, but useful books set you on the track of problems that you hadn't thought of.
The main problem with innovation is that it is a process of exploration, and you need to get as much guidance as you can.
Pasteur's comment was that "chance favours the prepared mind".
-- Bill Sloman. Sydney
CCFL transformer
Re: CCFL transformer
