Sujet : Re: blame electronics
De : bill.sloman (at) *nospam* ieee.org (Bill Sloman)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 29. Apr 2024, 06:38:31
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v0nbon$1iftm$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 29/04/2024 5:03 am, John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 27 Apr 2024 12:22:57 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
On 4/27/2024 9:56 AM, John Larkin wrote:
>
https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/26/opinions/opinion-the-cause-of-campus-chaos-zakaria/index.html
>
TV, and now cell phones.
>
>
Hilarious how the WSJ-shithead claims that when thousands of students
are willing to be beaten and arrested en masse it implies they're "less
resilient and disengaged." Did Tienanmen Square need TikTok to happen?
>
The super-rich will say any nonsense to protect their interests and the
dividends of their gruesome wars. Fareed Zakaria, Douglas Belkin, the
WSJ and NYT just work for 'em.
>
One of the more amusing indie games in recent history, where you play
the editor of the NYT and have to keep the paper running while ensuring
the super-rich, the police, and the state of Israel are always satisfied
with the content:
>
<https://molleindustria.itch.io/the-new-york-times-simulator>
One thing it's worth asking yourself, if more people were like me,
would the world be a better place?
It isn't. There's no way that you can can generate an objectively reliable estimate on your own effect on the world as a whole.
Anybody silly enough to ask the question has to live with the fact that if you are that silly your effect on the world is bound to be negative.
In John Larkin's case, his enthusiasm for climate change denial propaganda guarantees that his net effect on the world as a whole is going to be negative.
-- Bill Sloman, Sydney