Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing
De : blockedofcourse (at) *nospam* foo.invalid (Don Y)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 04. May 2024, 23:55:46
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v16atd$1dtom$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2
On 5/4/2024 1:29 PM, Carlos E.R. wrote:
AM radio can be leveraged for wide area coverage without requiring
lots of other technology to keep it operational.  And, the receivers
can run for long periods of time on batteries (that are likely
stale) or clock-spring mechanisms (emergency radios).
>
I have seen radios with a hand spun dynamo.
>
I have one with a clockwork mechanism -- wind up a large spring and
it drives a small "generator" as it unwinds.  It takes about 5 minutes
to unwind completely so it's a relatively low "winding" duty cycle.
>
But, it is large-ish.
>
It also has solar cells and a small, internal battery (which is toast;
but, attempting to disassemble it to replace the battery would likely
result in a mess of gears and torsion spring parts!)  As the spring mechanism
will run the radio despite the bad battery, it seems a safer plan to just
tolerate the bad battery!
 That's a bad design, that the battery of such a thing can not be replaced "easily".
I suspect it is a rechargeable cell that the designers thought
would "never" need to be replaced.
The fact that it works *despite* the state of the cell suggests
SOME forethought was put into the design.  The mechanism being
able to release enough mechanical energy to the generator over
such a long period of time without relying on the instantaneous
energy created by hand-cranking a generator and storing it *in*
that cell.
(This is how many "emergency flashlights" work -- and FAIL
to work, over time; relying on the cell to remain functional!)

Date Sujet#  Auteur
2 May 24 * AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing31Jan Panteltje
2 May 24 +* Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing13Carlos E.R.
2 May 24 i+* Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing3Jan Panteltje
2 May 24 ii+- Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing1Carlos E.R.
3 May 24 ii`- Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing1RodionGork
2 May 24 i+* Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing7Don Y
4 May 24 ii`* Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing6Carlos E.R.
4 May 24 ii `* Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing5Don Y
4 May 24 ii  +* Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing2John Larkin
4 May 24 ii  i`- Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing1Ralph Mowery
4 May 24 ii  `* Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing2Carlos E.R.
4 May 24 ii   `- Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing1Don Y
3 May 24 i`* Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing2Joe Gwinn
4 May 24 i `- Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing1Carlos E.R.
2 May 24 +* Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing2Martin Brown
2 May 24 i`- Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing1Jan Panteltje
2 May 24 +* Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing5John Larkin
2 May 24 i`* Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing4Martin Brown
2 May 24 i `* Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing3John Larkin
2 May 24 i  `* Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing2Martin Brown
2 May 24 i   `- Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing1john larkin
2 May 24 +- Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing1Ralph Mowery
3 May 24 `* Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing9John Larkin
4 May 24  `* Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing8Carlos E.R.
4 May 24   +* Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing3John Larkin
4 May 24   i`* Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing2Ralph Mowery
4 May 24   i `- Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing1John Larkin
4 May 24   +* Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing3Jeroen Belleman
4 May 24   i`* Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing2Carlos E.R.
5 May 24   i `- Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing1Jeroen Belleman
5 May 24   `- Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing1Liz Tuddenham

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal