Sujet : Re: Another design
De : jjSNIPlarkin (at) *nospam* highNONOlandtechnology.com (John Larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 10. May 2024, 22:06:44
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Highland Tech
Message-ID : <cm2t3jhladaa6cbtkitrch1op9rd0sh3so@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Forte Agent 3.1/32.783
On Fri, 10 May 2024 11:35:35 -0700, John Larkin
<
jjSNIPlarkin@highNONOlandtechnology.com> wrote:
On Thu, 9 May 2024 23:11:03 -0400, "Edward Rawde"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
"Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:v1ho21$4ps$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com...
Now with 9V to 15V input range, direct gate drive and 500mA LED current.
>
Startup behaviour is not ideal but maybe that can be fixed if it needs
fixing.
>
What's the cheapest op amp I can use for U2 instead of OP07?
>
Is there a cheaper comparator instead of LT1719 which will work?
Also the fet is bigger than it needs to ne.
>
Is there a better device for D4? Particularly if R4 can be reduced.
>
Will it work at all? Except in simulation.
>
>
I think I've answered my own question for the current controller but I don't
think it's feasible to attempt a discrete comparator on cost grounds.
>
I think the LED constant-current switcher can be done with a pfet and
two NPN transistors.
That's overkill. A pfet and one NPN might work.