Sujet : Re: Another design
De : invalid (at) *nospam* invalid.invalid (Edward Rawde)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 11. May 2024, 00:05:10
Autres entêtes
Organisation : BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com)
Message-ID : <v1m5mp$14m7$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
"piglet" <
erichpwagner@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:v1m48d$1j1bc$1@dont-email.me...Edward Rawde <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
"John Larkin" <jjSNIPlarkin@highNONOlandtechnology.com> wrote in message
news:gnps3j99nl7t4dkdt22k7oe5tr0e6dh60i@4ax.com...
On Thu, 9 May 2024 23:11:03 -0400, "Edward Rawde"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
"Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:v1ho21$4ps$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com...
Now with 9V to 15V input range, direct gate drive and 500mA LED
current.
>
Startup behaviour is not ideal but maybe that can be fixed if it needs
fixing.
>
What's the cheapest op amp I can use for U2 instead of OP07?
>
Is there a cheaper comparator instead of LT1719 which will work?
Also the fet is bigger than it needs to ne.
>
Is there a better device for D4? Particularly if R4 can be reduced.
>
Will it work at all? Except in simulation.
>
>
I think I've answered my own question for the current controller but I
don't
think it's feasible to attempt a discrete comparator on cost grounds.
>
I think the LED constant-current switcher can be done with a pfet and
two NPN transistors.
>
>
Ok here's the spec.
>
Input voltage range 10.5V to 12.6 V. Preferably 10V to 15V.
>
Minimum efficiency. 80%
>
Inductor not bigger than 68uH 1A. Preferably smaller.
>
One, two or three LEDs at 500mA +/- 50mA
>
Filtered LED feed referenced to ground.
>
Maximum total LED wiring length. 12 inches.
>
EMC compliant in all countries.
>
Cost. Minimum which will meet spec.
>
>
>
>
My LM311 based idea works ok with 68uH inductors too. Efficiency is above
80% for supply 10 to 13V and still 77% at 16V
>
Haven't explored 1, 2 or 3 LED outputs.
>
You didn't say if "ground" was input negative or positive but if positive
ground then flip the circuit over and use a cheaper N-channel FET :)
Ground is input negative.
>
The input to a buck converter is pulsed current - you have mentioned
output
leads but some, possibly extensive, filtering will be needed on the input.
Yes it crossed my mind that the input may need EMC filtering too.
>
Pay me for EMC compliance :)
As long as it doesn't go in circles with filter this, failed again, filter
that, failed again, change the layout, failed again, etc
>
--
piglet