Re: fast discrete PHEMT one-shot

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: fast discrete PHEMT one-shot
De : bill.sloman (at) *nospam* ieee.org (Bill Sloman)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 17. May 2024, 07:37:13
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v26qej$21m7n$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 17/05/2024 2:46 am, John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 17 May 2024 00:40:32 +1000, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
 
On 16/05/2024 11:15 am, John Larkin wrote:
On Wed, 15 May 2024 22:46:27 -0000 (UTC), piglet
<erichpwagner@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
John Larkin <jjSNIPlarkin@highNONOlandtechnology.com> wrote:
>
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/agatzclr8pvr5470g6mc4/Phemt_One_Shot_1.jpg?rlkey=cwnx0qd7ajgnh8otf627x5lku&raw=1
>
Regular monostables are terribly slow. This one has low prop delay and
high rep-rate, if the sim is to be believed.
>
SAV541 is mostly specified as an RF part, but it's a dynamite switch.
>
I can post a link to the files if anybody wants to play with this. All
my values are first guesses, no math involved, and it works!
>
My SAV541 Spice model is a revision of Phil Hobbs' original.
Mini-Circuits is adamant that they will never provide Spice models, a
typical RF-bigot attitude.
>
>
>
Yay! Eccles-Jordan ride again.
>
1918!
>
I think that was a bistable. I don't know when the monostable was > invented.
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multivibrator
>
has a two quotes from 1942 one from 1943 and two from 1949 which make it
clear that monostable had been invented by then. It sees it as a cut
down bistable, so Eccles-Jordan is probably a good name.
>
Since the first multivibrator circuit, the astable multivibrator
oscillator, was invented by Henri Abraham and Eugene Bloch during World
War I, it probably isn't the right name.
>
https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/AD0410225.pdf
>
is a 1963 Ph.D. on the bistable circuit.
>
People tend to roll eyes when I use one-shots in logic designs. I
can't see why.
>
You can't trigger a one-shot immediately after it has been triggered,
and the pulse width you get can be reduced if you re-trigger it too soon
after it has generated it's pulse, when it hasn't entirely recovered.
 The SN74123 retriggerable one-shot, and a Fairchild equivalent, are
over 50 years old.
But you don't get a new pulse when you retrigger a retriggerable monostable - you just stretch the one you had already started.

And "it's" is not the possessive form. It's means "it is."
I do  know that but produce the mistake as a typo from time to time, as you are well aware.
And you've snipped the rest of my post, without marking the snip.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

Date Sujet#  Auteur
15 May 24 * fast discrete PHEMT one-shot15John Larkin
15 May 24 +* Re: fast discrete PHEMT one-shot3Phil Hobbs
16 May 24 i`* Re: fast discrete PHEMT one-shot2Phil Hobbs
16 May 24 i `- Re: fast discrete PHEMT one-shot1John Larkin
16 May 24 `* Re: fast discrete PHEMT one-shot11piglet
16 May 24  `* Re: fast discrete PHEMT one-shot10John Larkin
16 May 24   +- Re: fast discrete PHEMT one-shot1Phil Hobbs
16 May 24   `* Re: fast discrete PHEMT one-shot8Bill Sloman
16 May 24    +* Re: fast discrete PHEMT one-shot6John Larkin
16 May 24    i+* Re: fast discrete PHEMT one-shot4Edward Rawde
17 May 24    ii`* Re: fast discrete PHEMT one-shot3John Larkin
17 May 24    ii +- Re: fast discrete PHEMT one-shot1Bill Sloman
18 May 24    ii `- Re: fast discrete PHEMT one-shot1piglet
17 May 24    i`- Re: fast discrete PHEMT one-shot1Bill Sloman
18 May 24    `- Re: fast discrete PHEMT one-shot1Bill Sloman

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal