Sujet : Re: smart people doing stupid things
De : blockedofcourse (at) *nospam* foo.invalid (Don Y)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 18. May 2024, 07:50:32
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v29fji$2l9d8$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2
On 5/17/2024 9:49 PM, Edward Rawde wrote:
"Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:v29bqi$14iv$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com...
"Don Y" <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote in message
news:v29aso$2kjfs$1@dont-email.me...
On 5/17/2024 7:11 PM, Edward Rawde wrote:
"Don Y" <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote in message
news:v28rap$2e811$3@dont-email.me...
On 5/17/2024 1:43 PM, Edward Rawde wrote:
Not sure how he managed to say master debaters that many times while
seemingly keeping a straight face but it reminds me of this:
https://www.learningmethods.com/downloads/pdf/james.alcock--the.belief.engine.pdf
>
One thing which bothers me about AI is that if it's like us but way
more
intelligent than us then...
>
The 'I' in AI doesn't refer to the same sense of "intelligence" that
you are imagining.
>
Strange that you could know what I was imagining.
>
People are invariably mislead by thinking that there is "intelligence"
involved in the technology. If there is intelligence, then there should
be *reason*, right? If there is reason, then I should be able to inquire
as to what, specifically, those reasons were for any "decision"/choice
that is made.
What is a decision?
Any option to take one fork vs. another.
smart people doing stupid things
Re: smart people doing stupid things