Re: CO2 Funny

On Fri, 24 May 2024 22:31:52 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs
<pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:

john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:

On Fri, 24 May 2024 11:43:42 -0400, Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net>
wrote:
 

On Fri, 24 May 2024 07:17:55 -0700, john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:
 

On Fri, 24 May 2024 11:29:37 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
<pommyb@aol.com> wrote:
 

On Thu, 23 May 2024 07:08:05 -0700, john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:
 

On Thu, 23 May 2024 09:33:11 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
<pommyb@aol.com> wrote:
 

On Wed, 22 May 2024 10:52:40 -0700, john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:
 

On Wed, 22 May 2024 18:10:58 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
<pommyB@aol.com> wrote:
 

On Wed, 22 May 2024 07:54:30 -0700, john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:
 

On Wed, 22 May 2024 13:58:13 -0000 (UTC), jim whitby
<news@spockmail.net> wrote:
 

On Wed, 22 May 2024 14:36:00 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard wrote:
 
<snip>
 

Who says I don't? Unlike you, an odious little narcissist, I don't feel
the need to show everyone here how clever I am.

 
Spoken like a true liberal.
 
When things don't go your way... start name calling.

 
Exactly. Cheap insults are, well, cheap.

 
Indeed.
 
9djf3jlovr2bmpkn03e18237njtcorg9rj@4ax.com

 
 
That was, in my opinion, a reasonable observation. Nasty humorless
people DO usually design nasty electronics. Or no electronics.

 
Your hypocrisy is breathtaking!
 
You started this off topic thread in which you posed a question
completely unrelated to the subject. I answered your question
honestly but your narcissism prompted you to take it as an insult
presumably because I hadn't massaged your ego. You leapt in feet first
with your stock insult and when I retaliated you and your fan club
rounded on me for having the audacity to call out one of the worst
offenders for insults.
 
If you want to see SED cleaned up you should take a leaf out of your
own book and stop indulging in off topic rubbish.

 
Like active filters?

 
Do try not to be so stupid. As you well know I was referring to the
subject of the current thread being off-topic.
 
Of course active filters are a suitable topic for discussion in SED,
but when you include a stupid question in your own off topic thread
you should not throw around insults when you get an answer you don't
expect. Were you hoping for a "yes please" type of response?

 
Obviously. But nobody is interested.
 
Are you here to discuss electronics, or to cackle and insult? Lately
SED is full of clucking old hens who probably haven't owned an
oscilloscope in decades.

 
If ever.
 
Joe Gwinn

 
I got my first scope, a Heathkit, when I was in junior high school. It
was I think 5 MHz, all ac-coupled, repetitive sweep, uncalibrated,
pretty primitive.
 
I later got a summer job in a university physics  department and got
to use a Tektronix. I was amazed. That 535 cost as much as a Chevrolet
at the time.

>
I first used one when I was 10 or 11, in my sister’s freshman physics lab.
(Physics 110 at UBC, probably fall 1970.)
>
I remember that it had delayed sweep , and wasn’t anything too fancy
otherwise, so it was probably a 522 or something like that. (The lab
session was about learning how to use the scope, which was pretty cool.)
>
Cheers
>
Phil Hobbs

There were a couple of plugins that did things that no scope does
today. The diffamp with switchable high and low bandwidth, and the
astounding differential comparators.