Re: CO2 Funny

On 25/05/2024 2:42 am, Pomegranate Bastard wrote:

On Fri, 24 May 2024 07:17:55 -0700, john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:
 

On Fri, 24 May 2024 11:29:37 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
<pommyb@aol.com> wrote:
>

On Thu, 23 May 2024 07:08:05 -0700, john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:
>

On Thu, 23 May 2024 09:33:11 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
<pommyb@aol.com> wrote:
>

On Wed, 22 May 2024 10:52:40 -0700, john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:
>

On Wed, 22 May 2024 18:10:58 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
<pommyB@aol.com> wrote:
>

On Wed, 22 May 2024 07:54:30 -0700, john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:
>

On Wed, 22 May 2024 13:58:13 -0000 (UTC), jim whitby
<news@spockmail.net> wrote:
>

On Wed, 22 May 2024 14:36:00 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard wrote:
>
<snip>
>

Who says I don't? Unlike you, an odious little narcissist, I don't feel
the need to show everyone here how clever I am.

>
Spoken like a true liberal.
>
When things don't go your way... start name calling.

>
Exactly. Cheap insults are, well, cheap.

>
Indeed.
>
9djf3jlovr2bmpkn03e18237njtcorg9rj@4ax.com

>
>
That was, in my opinion, a reasonable observation. Nasty humorless
people DO usually design nasty electronics. Or no electronics.

>
Your hypocrisy is breathtaking!
>
You started this off topic thread in which you posed a question
completely unrelated to the subject. I answered your question
honestly but your narcissism prompted you to take it as an insult
presumably because I hadn't massaged your ego. You leapt in feet first
with your stock insult and when I retaliated you and your fan club
rounded on me for having the audacity to call out one of the worst
offenders for insults.
>
If you want to see SED cleaned up you should take a leaf out of your
own book and stop indulging in off topic rubbish.

>
Like active filters?

>
Do try not to be so stupid. As you well know I was referring to the
subject of the current thread being off-topic.
>
Of course active filters are a suitable topic for discussion in SED,
but when you include a stupid question in your own off topic thread
you should not throw around insults when you get an answer you don't
expect. Were you hoping for a "yes please" type of response?

>
Obviously. But nobody is interested.

 Precisely. And I said so, but I didn't expect a barrage of abuse from
you and your fan club.
 

>
Are you here to discuss electronics, or to cackle and insult? Lately
SED is full of clucking old hens who probably haven't owned an
oscilloscope in decades.

 There you go again making unfounded assumptions. Will you ever stop
your crude insults?

Probably not. He's been at it for twenty years now. He seems to have gotten a bit more formulaic in recent years, but the basic idea that true circuit design consists of slinging stuff together and seeing if it works (without paying much attention to data sheets) has been pretty consistent. He resents suggestions that imply that he should learn about more about the components he is abusing, presumably because he's well aware that he can't.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney