Re: An actual circuit

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: An actual circuit
De : pcdhSpamMeSenseless (at) *nospam* electrooptical.net (Phil Hobbs)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 25. May 2024, 18:21:08
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v2t6m3$2vfkm$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:
On Sat, 25 May 2024 03:36:06 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs
<pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
 
Mike Monett VE3BTI <spamme@not.com> wrote:
Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
 
Insect cruelty. Plus you have to count their tiny feets backwards.
 
The only good bugs is dead bugs. ;)
 
Cheers
 
Phil Hobbs
 
The major flaw with dead bugs is you lose the identification of the ic.
 
Six months later, you will have no idea what the circuit is, where the
important signals are, or how the circuit works.
 
Nah. I build them inside the lid of a cast aluminum stomp box, and put a
paper schematic inside.  No worries.
 
Where do you document the results?
 
 

Depends. If it’s a small test instrument, usually in my lab book.  If it’s
for a product or an experiment, I mostly use Markdown files in the
corresponding git repository.

We keep private repos on github and gitlab, as well as bare repos on
various computers and NAS boxes in different locations.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs  Principal Consultant  ElectroOptical Innovations LLC /
Hobbs ElectroOptics  Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics

Date Sujet#  Auteur
23 May 24 * An actual circuit32Edward Rawde
23 May 24 `* Re: An actual circuit31john larkin
24 May 24  `* Re: An actual circuit30john larkin
24 May 24   `* Re: An actual circuit29Edward Rawde
24 May 24    +* Re: An actual circuit6john larkin
24 May 24    i+* Re: An actual circuit3bitrex
24 May 24    ii`* Re: An actual circuit2bitrex
24 May 24    ii `- Re: An actual circuit1Edward Rawde
25 May 24    i`* Re: An actual circuit2Edward Rawde
25 May 24    i `- Re: An actual circuit1john larkin
24 May 24    `* Re: An actual circuit22Jeroen Belleman
24 May 24     +- Re: An actual circuit1john larkin
24 May 24     `* Re: An actual circuit20Edward Rawde
24 May 24      `* Re: An actual circuit19john larkin
24 May 24       `* Re: An actual circuit18Edward Rawde
24 May 24        `* Re: An actual circuit17john larkin
25 May 24         `* Re: An actual circuit16Phil Hobbs
25 May 24          `* Re: An actual circuit15Edward Rawde
25 May 24           `* Re: An actual circuit14Phil Hobbs
25 May 24            +- Re: An actual circuit1Edward Rawde
25 May 24            `* Re: An actual circuit12john larkin
25 May 24             `* Re: An actual circuit11Phil Hobbs
25 May 24              `* Re: An actual circuit10Mike Monett VE3BTI
25 May 24               +- Re: An actual circuit1john larkin
25 May 24               +* Re: An actual circuit4john larkin
25 May 24               i`* Re: An actual circuit3Edward Rawde
25 May 24               i `* Re: An actual circuit2john larkin
25 May 24               i  `- Re: An actual circuit1Edward Rawde
25 May 24               `* Re: An actual circuit4Phil Hobbs
25 May 24                `* Re: An actual circuit3john larkin
25 May 24                 `* Re: An actual circuit2Phil Hobbs
25 May 24                  `- Re: An actual circuit1john larkin

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal