Re: CO2 Funny

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: CO2 Funny
De : invalid (at) *nospam* invalid.invalid (Edward Rawde)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 25. May 2024, 20:38:20
Autres entêtes
Organisation : BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com)
Message-ID : <v2tb6t$tve$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
"Bill Sloman" <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in message news:v2na16$1nvei$1@dont-email.me...
On 23/05/2024 3:52 am, john larkin wrote:
On Wed, 22 May 2024 18:10:58 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
<pommyB@aol.com> wrote:
>
On Wed, 22 May 2024 07:54:30 -0700, john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:
>
On Wed, 22 May 2024 13:58:13 -0000 (UTC), jim whitby
<news@spockmail.net> wrote:
>
On Wed, 22 May 2024 14:36:00 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard wrote:
>
<snip>
>
Who says I don't? Unlike you, an odious little narcissist, I don't feel
the need to show everyone here how clever I am.
>
Spoken like a true liberal.
>
When things don't go your way... start name calling.
>
Exactly. Cheap insults are, well, cheap.
>
Indeed.
>
9djf3jlovr2bmpkn03e18237njtcorg9rj@4ax.com
>
>
That was, in my opinion, a reasonable observation. Nasty humorless
people DO usually design nasty electronics. Or no electronics.
>
John Larkin doesn't seem to 'design" anything. He throws together the stuff he sells like every other tinkerer.
>

Why does that matter to you so much?

I have two books in front of me.
One is "Introduction to Solid State Physics, C. Kittel"
The other is "FET Circuits. Rufus P Turner"

If I open the physics book at a random page I find a contour integral.
I wasn't bad at math and can handle contour integrals but it is also true that I grew up in a very practical electronics environment
where getting things working was way more important than understanding every little detail of the theory of how they worked.

If I open the FET book at a random page I find a circuit which may be usable as the basis of something I want to "design".
This isn't true of the physics book but that doesn't mean I don't find it to be interesting or useful knowledge.

Human psychology obviously plays a big part in electronics design as it does in electronics designers.

It does seem to be a trait of many (not all) electronics designers that if another designer isn't doing it the way they would do it
then they must be doing it wrong.

Would you be kind enough to give your opinion of John Larkin once per month instead of twice per day?




...



Date Sujet#  Auteur
21 May 24 * CO2 Funny68john larkin
21 May 24 +* Re: CO2 Funny2Bill Sloman
21 May 24 i`- Re: CO2 Funny1John R Walliker
21 May 24 `* Re: CO2 Funny65chrisq
21 May 24  `* Re: CO2 Funny64john larkin
21 May 24   +* Re: CO2 Funny62john larkin
21 May 24   i+* Re: CO2 Funny60john larkin
22 May 24   ii+- Re: CO2 Funny1Bill Sloman
22 May 24   ii+* Re: CO2 Funny48jim whitby
22 May 24   iii+* Re: CO2 Funny2jim whitby
23 May 24   iiii`- Re: CO2 Funny1Bill Sloman
22 May 24   iii+* Re: CO2 Funny42john larkin
22 May 24   iiii+* Re: CO2 Funny40john larkin
23 May 24   iiiii+* Re: CO2 Funny17Bill Sloman
25 May 24   iiiiii`* Re: CO2 Funny16Edward Rawde
26 May 24   iiiiii +* Re: CO2 Funny14Bill Sloman
26 May 24   iiiiii i`* Re: CO2 Funny13Edward Rawde
26 May 24   iiiiii i +* Re: CO2 Funny2john larkin
27 May 24   iiiiii i i`- Re: CO2 Funny1Jeroen Belleman
27 May 24   iiiiii i +* Re: CO2 Funny7Bill Sloman
27 May 24   iiiiii i i`* Re: CO2 Funny6john larkin
27 May 24   iiiiii i i `* Re: CO2 Funny5Bill Sloman
27 May 24   iiiiii i i  `* Re: CO2 Funny4john larkin
28 May 24   iiiiii i i   `* Re: CO2 Funny3Bill Sloman
28 May 24   iiiiii i i    `* Re: CO2 Funny2john larkin
28 May 24   iiiiii i i     `- Re: CO2 Funny1Bill Sloman
27 May 24   iiiiii i `* Re: CO2 Funny3Cursitor Doom
28 May 24   iiiiii i  `* Re: CO2 Funny2Bill Sloman
30 May 24   iiiiii i   `- Re: CO2 Funny1Bill Sloman
26 May 24   iiiiii `- Re: CO2 Funny1john larkin
23 May 24   iiiii+* Re: CO2 Funny16john larkin
24 May 24   iiiiii+- Re: CO2 Funny1Bill Sloman
24 May 24   iiiiii`* Re: CO2 Funny14john larkin
24 May 24   iiiiii +* Re: CO2 Funny10Joe Gwinn
24 May 24   iiiiii i`* Re: CO2 Funny9john larkin
24 May 24   iiiiii i +* Re: CO2 Funny2john larkin
25 May 24   iiiiii i i`- Re: CO2 Funny1Bill Sloman
25 May 24   iiiiii i `* Re: CO2 Funny6Phil Hobbs
25 May 24   iiiiii i  `* Re: CO2 Funny5john larkin
25 May 24   iiiiii i   `* Re: CO2 Funny4Phil Hobbs
25 May 24   iiiiii i    `* Re: CO2 Funny3Mike Monett VE3BTI
25 May 24   iiiiii i     +- Re: CO2 Funny1Phil Hobbs
25 May 24   iiiiii i     `- Re: CO2 Funny1Jeroen Belleman
24 May 24   iiiiii +- Re: CO2 Funny1john larkin
25 May 24   iiiiii +- Re: CO2 Funny1Bill Sloman
25 May 24   iiiiii `- Re: CO2 Funny1Bill Sloman
23 May 24   iiiii+- Re: CO2 Funny1john larkin
26 May 24   iiiii`* Re: CO2 Funny5Cursitor Doom
26 May 24   iiiii +* Re: CO2 Funny3john larkin
27 May 24   iiiii i+- Re: CO2 Funny1Bill Sloman
27 May 24   iiiii i`- Re: CO2 Funny1john larkin
27 May 24   iiiii `- Re: CO2 Funny1Bill Sloman
23 May 24   iiii`- Re: CO2 Funny1Bill Sloman
22 May 24   iii+* Re: CO2 Funny2john larkin
23 May 24   iiii`- Re: CO2 Funny1Bill Sloman
23 May 24   iii`- Re: CO2 Funny1Bill Sloman
22 May 24   ii`* Re: CO2 Funny10Jeroen Belleman
22 May 24   ii `* Re: CO2 Funny9john larkin
22 May 24   ii  +* Re: CO2 Funny6john larkin
22 May 24   ii  i+- Re: CO2 Funny1john larkin
23 May 24   ii  i+* Re: CO2 Funny3chrisq
23 May 24   ii  ii`* Re: CO2 Funny2john larkin
23 May 24   ii  ii `- Re: CO2 Funny1Bill Sloman
23 May 24   ii  i`- Re: CO2 Funny1Bill Sloman
23 May 24   ii  +- Re: CO2 Funny1Bill Sloman
25 May 24   ii  `- Re: CO2 Funny1Bill Sloman
22 May 24   i`- Re: CO2 Funny1Bill Sloman
22 May 24   `- Re: CO2 Funny1Bill Sloman

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal