Re: OT: 'Peer Reviewed' Papers - a new scam!

On 5/28/2024 5:42 PM, john larkin wrote:

On Tue, 28 May 2024 17:35:46 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
 

On 5/28/2024 5:07 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:

On Tue, 28 May 2024 16:02:38 -0400, bitrex wrote:
>

I'm unsure if there have been any significant recent developments in
conservative philosophy recently, but if there's been like, some
paradigm-shifting discoveries in the field of wingnutology I'm open to
reading the journals that contain them.
>
But my impression has been that wingnutology is not shall we say a
"highly nuanced philosophy" and that's one of the keys to its
popularity, it doesn't need an academic journal to understand.
>
Love guns, love Trump, have a long list of commies, queers, and
degenerate enemies that need to get waxed, and you've basically got at
least a bachelors of arts in the field at this time. what more is there
to know about it. Park your pickup in a EV parking spot is the
equivalent of a masters degree. Kick a queer or homeless person straight
in the head and you got your PhD, easy.

>
That's precisely the problem with you elitist types. You believe no one
should be allowed to express any political opinion unless they have a
degree from somewhere like Columbia or Brown. Your sort  believe it's only
permissible to espouse a view if it's couched in suitably nuanced terms -
which conveniently excludes anyone with populist, Right-wing sensibilities
who didn't have a privileged upbringing. So much for "inclusiveness" eh.
>

>
Not so much about not letting anyone but academics in but more like the
same reason I don't let vacuum cleaner salesmen or Jehovah's Witnesses
in my front door; because populist right-wing sensibilities is 1%
substance and 99% sales.

 
The USA is definitely swinging right. The lefty philosophy fails to
understand that there are greedy, lazy, and criminal people in the
world, and they need to be managed.

>
What's to understand? The rulers of every totalitarian dump that ever
was figured they were doing just that and/or doing the Lords work,
depending.