Re: Optocoupler datasheets

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: Optocoupler datasheets
De : blockedofcourse (at) *nospam* foo.invalid (Don Y)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 29. May 2024, 18:26:15
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v37kvo$179ua$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2
On 5/29/2024 8:53 AM, bitrex wrote:
Situations where they're just left on for DC most of the time and trying to get minimal forward current by optimizing a resistor value seem hopeless.
Exactly.  You can "play games" with how hard you "overdrive" the emitter as
well as add current gain on the isolated side to store enough charge to carry
over long enough for the longest off period (duty cycle and frequency related)
that you want to tolerate.
We use this technique for driving outputs that need to be self-reseting
in the event that the processor "dies" (you have to make sure you design
your code so the processor can't crash in a loop that keeps pulsing the
output(s) -- I've seen more than one fool make that mistake!)

Could wrap a DC feedback loop around it which would only make sense in the situations where you have a lot more power available on the secondary side for some reason, hard to think of a use case.
<frown>  Unless you're looking for a linear transfer function, feedback
(except as a diagnostic) is usually not appropriate.

Logic-output couplers seem somewhat better specified in the sense they explicit state the relatively high minimum forward currents or all bets are off.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
29 May 24 * Optocoupler datasheets25bitrex
29 May 24 +- Re: Optocoupler datasheets1Miguel Gimenez
29 May 24 +* Re: Optocoupler datasheets3Don Y
29 May 24 i`* Re: Optocoupler datasheets2bitrex
29 May 24 i `- Re: Optocoupler datasheets1Don Y
29 May 24 +* Re: Optocoupler datasheets2john larkin
30 May 24 i`- Re: Optocoupler datasheets1bitrex
29 May 24 +* Re: Optocoupler datasheets13piglet
29 May 24 i`* Re: Optocoupler datasheets12Phil Hobbs
30 May 24 i `* Re: Optocoupler datasheets11piglet
30 May 24 i  `* Re: Optocoupler datasheets10Phil Hobbs
30 May 24 i   `* Re: Optocoupler datasheets9john larkin
30 May 24 i    +* Re: Optocoupler datasheets6Phil Hobbs
30 May 24 i    i`* Re: Optocoupler datasheets5john larkin
31 May 24 i    i `* Re: Optocoupler datasheets4Phil Hobbs
31 May 24 i    i  `* Re: Optocoupler datasheets3john larkin
31 May 24 i    i   `* Re: Optocoupler datasheets2Phil Hobbs
31 May 24 i    i    `- Re: Optocoupler datasheets1john larkin
31 May 24 i    `* Re: Optocoupler datasheets2Edward Rawde
31 May 24 i     `- Re: Optocoupler datasheets1john larkin
29 May 24 `* Re: Optocoupler datasheets5Clive Arthur
30 May 24  `* Re: Optocoupler datasheets4boB
30 May 24   `* Re: Optocoupler datasheets3piglet
30 May 24    `* Re: Optocoupler datasheets2john larkin
30 May 24     `- Re: Optocoupler datasheets1boB

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal