Re: Yttrium iron garnet

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: Yttrium iron garnet
De : pcdhSpamMeSenseless (at) *nospam* electrooptical.net (Phil Hobbs)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 30. May 2024, 23:46:20
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v3as3c$1s3ma$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:
On Thu, 30 May 2024 11:03:19 GMT, Glen Walpert <nospam@null.void>
wrote:
 
On Thu, 30 May 2024 09:14:58 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom wrote:
 
On Thu, 30 May 2024 15:45:21 +1000, Bill Sloman wrote:
 
On 30/05/2024 3:37 am, john larkin wrote:
On Wed, 29 May 2024 17:12:21 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
<cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
 
On Wed, 29 May 2024 13:52:34 +1000, Bill Sloman wrote:
 
Yttrium iron garnet tuned oscillators were around back then, but
their 2GHz to 8GHz range was too high for me to count with the
integrated circuits around then - we had to go the Gigabit Logic's
GaAs parts to get to 800MHz, and that became the unique selling
point of the system.
 
YIG oscillators were quite the thing back in the day, but I'm
guessing they've been completely superseded by now to get to ever
higher frequencies. Seems we've gone from -
 
This misses Jan Panteltje's thread "Small magnetic tunable filter for
6G and beyond" which is about Yig being used today.
 
That article makes it seem like YIG is some revolutionary, new, emerging
technology!
 
Use of YIG filters as a replacement for varactor tuning could turn out to
be significant.  2022 Microwave Journal article:
 
<https://www.microwavejournal.com/articles/37980-reinventing-yig-
technology-for-microwave-filter-applications>
 
The VIDA oscillators still look like giant expensive power hogs. They
don't specify modulation bandwidth on the data sheets that I see, but
it must be terrible.
 
One can't modulate a hundreds-of-mA electromagnet very fast.
 
An LC osc with a varicap is a more sensible VCO. Narrowband, one can
varicap a coaxial ceramic resonator, or a PCB ring oscillator, or
something. Cheap and fast.

And far, far noisier than the best YIGs.

 
Of course, it's inherently difficult to modulate a high-Q resonator
fast, even without an electromagnet in the way.

It isn’t, actually, at least over a restricted range. If the resonator
obeys a differential equation, you can modulate its resonance much faster
than f_0/Q by changing L or C.

Resonators with significant time delay, such as a long piece of coax,
aren’t as friendly that way.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs  Principal Consultant  ElectroOptical Innovations LLC /
Hobbs ElectroOptics  Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics

Date Sujet#  Auteur
29 May 24 * Yttrium iron garnet16Bill Sloman
29 May 24 `* Re: Yttrium iron garnet15Cursitor Doom
29 May 24  `* Re: Yttrium iron garnet14john larkin
30 May 24   `* Re: Yttrium iron garnet13Bill Sloman
30 May 24    `* Re: Yttrium iron garnet12Cursitor Doom
30 May 24     +- Re: Yttrium iron garnet1Bill Sloman
30 May 24     `* Re: Yttrium iron garnet10john larkin
30 May 24      +- Re: Yttrium iron garnet1Bill Sloman
30 May 24      `* Re: Yttrium iron garnet8Phil Hobbs
30 May 24       `* Re: Yttrium iron garnet7john larkin
31 May 24        `* Re: Yttrium iron garnet6Phil Hobbs
31 May 24         `* Re: Yttrium iron garnet5john larkin
31 May 24          +- Re: Yttrium iron garnet1Bill Sloman
31 May 24          `* Re: Yttrium iron garnet3Jeroen Belleman
31 May 24           +- Re: Yttrium iron garnet1Phil Hobbs
31 May 24           `- Re: Yttrium iron garnet1john larkin

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal