Sujet : Re: IXTH76N25
De : jl (at) *nospam* 650pot.com (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 01. Jun 2024, 18:13:27
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <bphm5jpj7krqlrfiquban4r6ag59dje89b@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Sat, 1 Jun 2024 11:22:16 -0400, "Edward Rawde"
<
invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
"john larkin" <jl@650pot.com> wrote in message news:94bm5jdmr2pankvi7undusr2c0trdtt2om@4ax.com...
On Sat, 01 Jun 2024 08:51:23 -0400, David Bridgham <dab@froghouse.org>
wrote:
>
This data sheet from Mouser displays fine in the Brave web browser as
well as with xpdf and evince.
>
https://www.mouser.com/datasheet/2/240/media-3320179.pdf
>
It's a work of fiction. No dpak fet is going to run 76 amps and 460
watts.
>
But bigger is better for marketing, like 2N3055 115W power npn but we're not saying what kind of liquid cooling is needed for that.
>
>
I do like the typ BVdss spec, which is the avalanche voltage. They
don't say if the gate has a zener.
>
IR started the absurd mosfet specs by using flowing liquid cooling and
tiny footnotes about "packaging limited."
Everybody else had to go along to be competitive.
A dpak solders to a PCB. No PCB is going to soak up 100 watts, much
less 460.
IXTH76N25
Re: IXTH76N25