Sujet : Re: AD5791
De : jl (at) *nospam* 650pot.com (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 05. Jun 2024, 18:56:18
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <kj916j12iu5jm5p2qv3kcdsugm5c6ku79o@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Wed, 05 Jun 2024 12:50:59 -0400, Joe Gwinn <
joegwinn@comcast.net>
wrote:
On Tue, 04 Jun 2024 13:56:36 -0700, john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:
>
On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 21:53:13 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
<jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:
>
On 6/4/24 19:48, john larkin wrote:
https://www.analog.com/en/products/ad5791.html
That's an amazing part. 20 bit DAC with 1 PPM accuracy and 0.05 PPM
per degree C tempco.
My main gripe is its 3.4K output impedance, which makes a lot of
Johnson noise. I suppose I could run a bunch in parallel.
>
But you can power the chip from +/-16V and the LSB can be in
the 25uV ballpark. The Johnson noise of 7.5nV/rtHz doesn't
seem so bad then, does it?
>
Jeroen Belleman
>
That helps some. +-14v is about the limit on the references. We'd have
to divide down to get our +-10v range back, and that would need some
crazy stable resistors.
>
Looks like the other way to get the noise down would be to parallel a
number of DACs. Times 8 channels! Ballpark $100 per DAC, which is
actually feasible.
>
It will of course need crazy-low-noise hyper-stable references.
>
I wonder how ADI tests these parts. I can't buy a 1 PPM accurate DVM.
>
Aren't 6.5-digit DMMs exactly 1PPM?
>
Joe Gwinn
I think the best I've seen is something like 4 PPM. For north of
$14K.