Re: Do you condemn Hamas?

On 6/7/2024 7:52 AM, Bill Sloman wrote:

On 7/06/2024 5:32 pm, Cursitor Doom wrote:

On Fri, 7 Jun 2024 15:48:06 +1000, Bill Sloman wrote:
>

On 7/06/2024 7:27 am, NefeshBarYochai wrote:

This question became seemingly ubiquitous following October 7. As
Palestinians defied the imagination, breaking out of Gaza after over a
decade and a half of living under total air, land, and sea blockade,
many found themselves having to face this question.

>
<snipped the rest of the tedious nonsense>
>
Everybody sane condemns Hamas. Murdering some 1300 people at a music
festival may be an ideological statement, but it's primarily a
psychopathic act of attention-getting terrorism, and the people who
planned it need to be locked up someplace where they can't do it again.
>
An idiot who tries to justify it as a political gestures is a menace,
and should be locked away on the same basis.

>
Bill has a bit of a problem with anyone who disagrees with him. He wants
them all either jailed or executed. How typically neo-Liberal!

 Hamas is definitely disagreeable. Cursitor Doom seems to think that there's something "neo-Liberal" about not liking murderous terrorists.
 We know he like preposterous conspiracy theories. Presumably he's got one about the murderous antics of Hamas.
 -- Bill Sloman, Sydney
 

North Korea, Russia, and China are looking on with envious eyes as to how much firepower the US can help Israel put onto civilian targets, they're like "Hey! that was supposed to be our job!"
They're taking notes on the "advanced tactics" being used in Gaza such as "Today's neighborhood is grid square E4, take a squad in there, kick down the doors of every home and office and shoot anything that moves."
For all the trillions of taxpayer dollars that have been poured into the "science" of "modern warfare" it should come as no surprise that counter-insurgency tactics haven't fundamentally changed a bit since My Lai in 1968. Money well-spent...