Re: Challenger

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: Challenger
De : Jeff (at) *nospam* invalid.invalid (Jeff Layman)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 09. Jun 2024, 08:21:52
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v43l6g$39bjl$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 09/06/2024 03:42, john larkin wrote:
https://www.amazon.com/Challenger-Story-Heroism-Disaster-Space/dp/198217661X
 This is a very well researched and written book, and a sad, ghastly
story.
 It reminds me that humans have no purpose in space but to die.
That's a very jaundiced and negative view. Firstly, they weren't in space when they died; they were at 46000 feet, which was below the operational height of Concorde.
On that subject, the only fatal crash of Concorde took place just after take-off almost 25 years after it started service. By your criterion, supersonic flight would have been blamed for the crash, and its purpose deemed unnecessary, even though the accident had nothing to do with supersonic flight, or perhaps even flight itself. Those Wright Brothers have a lot to answer for!
It is human nature to explore, even at the extremes. Where would America be if it wasn't for the Vikings, Columbus, and others like them?
--
Jeff

Date Sujet#  Auteur
9 Jun 24 * Challenger39john larkin
9 Jun 24 +* Re: Challenger14Jeff Layman
9 Jun 24 i+- Re: Challenger1Nick Hayward
9 Jun 24 i`* Re: Challenger12john larkin
9 Jun 24 i `* Re: Challenger11Cursitor Doom
9 Jun 24 i  `* Re: Challenger10john larkin
10 Jun 24 i   +* Re: Challenger8Cursitor Doom
11 Jun 24 i   i`* Re: Challenger7Bill Sloman
12 Jun 24 i   i `* Re: Challenger6Cursitor Doom
12 Jun 24 i   i  `* Re: Challenger5Bill Sloman
12 Jun 24 i   i   `* Re: Challenger4Cursitor Doom
13 Jun 24 i   i    `* Re: Challenger3Bill Sloman
16 Jun 24 i   i     `* Re: Challenger2Cursitor Doom
19 Jun 24 i   i      `- Re: Challenger1Bill Sloman
10 Jun 24 i   `- Re: Challenger1Joe Gwinn
9 Jun 24 +- Re: Challenger1Bill Sloman
9 Jun 24 +* Re: Challenger22Phil Hobbs
9 Jun 24 i`* Re: Challenger21john larkin
9 Jun 24 i +* Re: Challenger2Cursitor Doom
9 Jun 24 i i`- Re: Challenger1john larkin
9 Jun 24 i +* Re: Challenger17Phil Hobbs
10 Jun 24 i i`* Re: Challenger16bitrex
10 Jun 24 i i `* Re: Challenger15Phil Hobbs
11 Jun 24 i i  +* Re: Challenger5bitrex
11 Jun 24 i i  i`* Re: Challenger4Phil Hobbs
11 Jun 24 i i  i `* Re: Challenger3bitrex
11 Jun 24 i i  i  `* Re: Challenger2john larkin
11 Jun 24 i i  i   `- Re: Challenger1Phil Hobbs
11 Jun 24 i i  `* Re: Challenger9Martin Brown
11 Jun 24 i i   +* Re: Challenger4Phil Hobbs
12 Jun 24 i i   i`* Re: Challenger3Bill Sloman
12 Jun 24 i i   i `* Re: Challenger2Martin Brown
12 Jun 24 i i   i  `- Re: Challenger1Bill Sloman
11 Jun 24 i i   +* Re: Challenger2john larkin
12 Jun 24 i i   i`- Re: Challenger1Bill Sloman
11 Jun 24 i i   `* Re: Challenger2bitrex
11 Jun 24 i i    `- Re: Challenger1bitrex
11 Jun 24 i `- Re: Challenger1Bill Sloman
11 Jun 24 `- Re: Challenger1john larkin

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal