Sujet : Re: Quantum mystics
De : jl (at) *nospam* 650pot.com (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 10. Jun 2024, 00:56:12
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <eqfc6j9ajc7k56ea8g9nu1esju9sjp8g0s@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Sun, 9 Jun 2024 22:07:53 +0100, Martin Brown
<'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> wrote:
On 09/06/2024 21:08, john larkin wrote:
On Sun, 9 Jun 2024 20:46:53 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
<jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:
I just watched a talk by Anton Zeilinger, professor of physics
at the university of Vienna, and 2022 Nobel laureate, about
quantum effects and entanglement.
>
Link please? It is impossible to comment without seeing his talk.
Plug his name into Youtube and his Nobel speech pops up.
>
I feel a rant bubbling up!
Good so far!
>
It was true when I was an undergraduate and it is still just as true
today that if you claim to fully understand quantum mechanics then you
don't fully understand quantum mechanics.
I suspect that aspects of this universe, big and small, can never be
understood by our brains. We can experiment, confirm, and accept.
The split-beam interferometer was designed specifically to mess with
our heads.
Quantum mystics
Re: Quantum mystics
