Sujet : Re: Quantum mystics
De : jl (at) *nospam* 650pot.com (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 10. Jun 2024, 20:52:40
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <jpie6j1fkk42r0cvp8t80acrsc6eq0hvgb@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 17:55:47 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
<
jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:
On 6/10/24 10:14, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> wrote:
... I was ok with mathematics in school until we started
on calculus. I could not, and still cannot, understand concepts such as
"vanishingly small".
Calculus is to arithmetic what astrology is to astronomy.
>
Now now, that's unjustified. Calculus is eminently useful
and perfectly rigorous.
>
Mathematics is a tool chest. Unfortunately, the way it's
taught, few people end up being able to use the tools.
>
Jeroen Belleman
How often do you use real, symbolic calculus?
Solving differential equations?
Quantum mystics
Re: Quantum mystics
