Re: Challenger

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: Challenger
De : user (at) *nospam* example.net (bitrex)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 11. Jun 2024, 17:45:40
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <66687f34$4$3738373$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/11/2024 10:58 AM, Martin Brown wrote:

ISTR at least one Morton Thiokol engineer was begging them not to launch with it so cold but was over ruled by more senior people in the end.
 Rocket launches and landings are intrinsically dangerous. On this I am inclined to agree with JL - unless and until we find something that our robotic and AI kit cannot do we shouldn't be sending people into space.
 It was the *only* way to explore the moon back in 1969 but not any more...
 
The shuttle was a dual-use vehicle, it could've made a formidable weapon in a pinch. The Soviets thought so, at least.
The large crossrange from the delta wings made once-around space bomber missions north from Vandenburg feasible, though IIRC they never launched from there.
The DOD didn't "force" the delta wings, exactly, crossrange was a desire of theirs that NASA eventually came around to as beneficial in general, it made another abort mode possible and simplified design calculations/simulations to be tractable with the tech available at the time.
But it's likely if they couldn't have come to a path of convergent evolution then the project wouldn't have gone forward at all.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
9 Jun 24 * Challenger39john larkin
9 Jun 24 +* Re: Challenger14Jeff Layman
9 Jun 24 i+- Re: Challenger1Nick Hayward
9 Jun 24 i`* Re: Challenger12john larkin
9 Jun 24 i `* Re: Challenger11Cursitor Doom
9 Jun 24 i  `* Re: Challenger10john larkin
10 Jun 24 i   +* Re: Challenger8Cursitor Doom
11 Jun 24 i   i`* Re: Challenger7Bill Sloman
12 Jun 24 i   i `* Re: Challenger6Cursitor Doom
12 Jun 24 i   i  `* Re: Challenger5Bill Sloman
12 Jun 24 i   i   `* Re: Challenger4Cursitor Doom
13 Jun 24 i   i    `* Re: Challenger3Bill Sloman
16 Jun 24 i   i     `* Re: Challenger2Cursitor Doom
19 Jun 24 i   i      `- Re: Challenger1Bill Sloman
10 Jun 24 i   `- Re: Challenger1Joe Gwinn
9 Jun 24 +- Re: Challenger1Bill Sloman
9 Jun 24 +* Re: Challenger22Phil Hobbs
9 Jun 24 i`* Re: Challenger21john larkin
9 Jun 24 i +* Re: Challenger2Cursitor Doom
9 Jun 24 i i`- Re: Challenger1john larkin
9 Jun 24 i +* Re: Challenger17Phil Hobbs
10 Jun 24 i i`* Re: Challenger16bitrex
10 Jun 24 i i `* Re: Challenger15Phil Hobbs
11 Jun 24 i i  +* Re: Challenger5bitrex
11 Jun 24 i i  i`* Re: Challenger4Phil Hobbs
11 Jun 24 i i  i `* Re: Challenger3bitrex
11 Jun 24 i i  i  `* Re: Challenger2john larkin
11 Jun 24 i i  i   `- Re: Challenger1Phil Hobbs
11 Jun 24 i i  `* Re: Challenger9Martin Brown
11 Jun 24 i i   +* Re: Challenger4Phil Hobbs
12 Jun 24 i i   i`* Re: Challenger3Bill Sloman
12 Jun 24 i i   i `* Re: Challenger2Martin Brown
12 Jun 24 i i   i  `- Re: Challenger1Bill Sloman
11 Jun 24 i i   +* Re: Challenger2john larkin
12 Jun 24 i i   i`- Re: Challenger1Bill Sloman
11 Jun 24 i i   `* Re: Challenger2bitrex
11 Jun 24 i i    `- Re: Challenger1bitrex
11 Jun 24 i `- Re: Challenger1Bill Sloman
11 Jun 24 `- Re: Challenger1john larkin

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal