Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array
De : invalid (at) *nospam* invalid.invalid (Edward Rawde)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 18. Jun 2024, 16:32:33
Autres entêtes
Organisation : BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com)
Message-ID : <v4s5q2$1tdk$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
"Bill Sloman" <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in message news:v4rheb$18s4m$1@dont-email.me...
On 14/06/2024 1:20 am, Bill Sloman wrote:
One option John Larjkin doesn't seem to have explored is using Renesas HFA3096 five transistor array as basis for his mononstable
and level shifter.
>
It offers three 8GHz NPN parts and two 5.5GHz PNP parts in a single array.
>
https://www.renesas.com/us/en/document/dst/hfa3046-hfa3096-hfa3127-hfa3128-datasheet?r=494216
>
Two of the NPN parts could make up my emitter-coupled monostable, and the two PNP parts could level shift the output.
>
The Renesas website offers Spice models for both the NPN and the PNP transistors, which one could plug into an LTSpice
simulation, at the cost of making it look too messy for the more sensitive designers to be able to look at.
>
I've spent that last four days in hospital with Covid-19 of the colon - dramatic when it started but tedious thereafter.

I thought you'd gone a bit quiet.
I hope you get fully recovered quickly.

It's been about two years since I had Covid.
All I noticed was loss of sense of smell and a cold but different variants affect different people differently.

>
This thread hasn't gone all that well. John Larkin has ignored the fact that I was talking about just the 3096. There have been
some sensible comments, but I'm still too sick to try and provide any kind of summing up of the sensible bits.
>
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
>
>
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Norton antivirus software.
www.norton.com



Date Sujet#  Auteur
13 Jun 24 * Fast monostable with a transistpor array35Bill Sloman
14 Jun 24 +* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array26Edward Rawde
14 Jun 24 i+- Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array1Edward Rawde
14 Jun 24 i`* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array24john larkin
14 Jun 24 i `* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array23Edward Rawde
14 Jun 24 i  `* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array22john larkin
14 Jun 24 i   +* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array11Edward Rawde
14 Jun 24 i   i`* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array10john larkin
14 Jun 24 i   i +* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array4Edward Rawde
14 Jun 24 i   i i`* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array3john larkin
14 Jun 24 i   i i `* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array2Edward Rawde
14 Jun 24 i   i i  `- Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array1john larkin
14 Jun 24 i   i `* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array5bitrex
15 Jun 24 i   i  +* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array3john larkin
15 Jun 24 i   i  i`* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array2john larkin
15 Jun 24 i   i  i `- Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array1Phil Hobbs
15 Jun 24 i   i  `- Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array1Edward Rawde
14 Jun 24 i   +- Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array1Gerhard Hoffmann
14 Jun 24 i   +* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array7piglet
14 Jun 24 i   i`* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array6Edward Rawde
14 Jun 24 i   i `* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array5john larkin
14 Jun 24 i   i  `* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array4Edward Rawde
15 Jun 24 i   i   `* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array3john larkin
15 Jun 24 i   i    `* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array2Edward Rawde
15 Jun 24 i   i     `- Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array1john larkin
15 Jun 24 i   `* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array2legg
15 Jun 24 i    `- Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array1Edward Rawde
18 Jun 24 `* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array8Bill Sloman
18 Jun 24  +* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array6john larkin
18 Jun 24  i`* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array5piglet
18 Jun 24  i `* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array4john larkin
19 Jun 24  i  `* Re: Fast monostable with a transistor array3Bill Sloman
23 Jun15:16  i   +- Re: Fast monostable with a transistor array1john larkin
24 Jun04:48  i   `- Re: Fast monostable with a transistor array1Bill Sloman
18 Jun 24  `- Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array1Edward Rawde

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal