Re: Chinese semiconductors

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: Chinese semiconductors
De : jl (at) *nospam* 650pot.com (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 19. Jun 2024, 14:18:42
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <9jl57jl75daa4rull8cpc0ung6hvbtkl5s@4ax.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 08:53:34 -0400, legg <legg@nospam.magma.ca> wrote:

On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 13:00:23 -0700, john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:
>
https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/major-chinese-semiconductor-company-goes-bankrupt-23-others-recently-withdrew-ipo-applications
>
Good grief. Crazy numbers.
>
10,000 bankruptcies representing only 1 in 5 start-ups for
the year.
>
Sounds like a normal ratio.
>
RL

The idea of any country "registering" 50,000 semiconductor companies
in one year is absurd.  It's the same corrupt fad dynamics as the
Chinese real-estate scam.

Communism always becomes savage and corrupt and inefficient. It's
really the wrong environment for inventing and developing electronics.
The US has lots of started-small innovative tech companies, some of
which are world-dominant now. I see a some of that in the UK and
Ireland and a bit in France and the Netherlands.

The sequence matters. Some outfits start with ideas and eventually
make a lot of money. Some start with a heap of invested money, have no
original ideas, and fail.





Date Sujet#  Auteur
18 Jun 24 * Chinese semiconductors28john larkin
18 Jun 24 +* Re: Chinese semiconductors2bitrex
19 Jun 24 i`- Re: Chinese semiconductors1Brian Gregory
19 Jun 24 +* Re: Chinese semiconductors21legg
19 Jun 24 i`* Re: Chinese semiconductors20john larkin
19 Jun 24 i +- Re: Chinese semiconductors1john larkin
19 Jun 24 i `* Re: Chinese semiconductors18Jan Panteltje
19 Jun 24 i  `* Re: Chinese semiconductors17john larkin
19 Jun 24 i   +* Re: Chinese semiconductors15Cursitor Doom
19 Jun 24 i   i`* Re: Chinese semiconductors14john larkin
19 Jun 24 i   i +* Re: Chinese semiconductors4Cursitor Doom
20 Jun 24 i   i i`* Re: Chinese semiconductors3john larkin
20 Jun 24 i   i i `* Re: Chinese semiconductors2Cursitor Doom
21 Jun 24 i   i i  `- Re: Chinese semiconductors1Dimiter_Popoff
21 Jun 24 i   i `* Re: Chinese semiconductors9Dimiter_Popoff
21 Jun 24 i   i  `* Re: Chinese semiconductors8Jan Panteltje
21 Jun 24 i   i   +* Re: Chinese semiconductors3Dimiter_Popoff
21 Jun 24 i   i   i`* Re: Chinese semiconductors2john larkin
1 Jul 24 i   i   i `- Re: Chinese semiconductors1Bill Sloman
21 Jun 24 i   i   `* Re: Chinese semiconductors4Cursitor Doom
22 Jun 24 i   i    `* Re: Chinese semiconductors3john larkin
22 Jun 24 i   i     +- Re: Chinese semiconductors1Cursitor Doom
1 Jul 24 i   i     `- Re: Chinese semiconductors1Bill Sloman
20 Jun 24 i   `- Re: Chinese semiconductors1Jan Panteltje
19 Jun 24 +* Re: Chinese semiconductors3Martin Rid
19 Jun 24 i`* Re: Chinese semiconductors2john larkin
20 Jun 24 i `- Re: Chinese semiconductors1Jan Panteltje
30 Jun 24 `- Re: Chinese semiconductors1The Running Man

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal