Re: Fast monostable with a transistor array

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: Fast monostable with a transistor array
De : bill.sloman (at) *nospam* ieee.org (Bill Sloman)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 24. Jun 2024, 04:48:21
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v5ampl$njkq$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 23/06/2024 10:29 pm, Chris Jones wrote:
On 19/06/2024 8:17 pm, Bill Sloman wrote:
On 19/06/2024 1:28 am, john larkin wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 13:48:58 -0000 (UTC), piglet
<erichpwagner@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 18:44:37 +1000, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
>
On 14/06/2024 1:20 am, Bill Sloman wrote:
One option John Larjkin doesn't seem to have explored is using Renesas
HFA3096 five transistor array as basis for his mononstable and level
shifter.
>
It offers three 8GHz NPN parts and two 5.5GHz PNP parts in a single array.
>
https://www.renesas.com/us/en/document/dst/hfa3046-hfa3096-hfa3127-hfa3128-datasheet?r=494216
>
Two of the NPN parts could make up my emitter-coupled monostable, and
the two PNP parts could level shift the output.
>
The Renesas website offers Spice models for both the NPN and the PNP
transistors, which one could plug into an LTSpice simulation, at the
cost of making it look too messy for the more sensitive designers to be
able to look at.
>
I've spent that last four days in hospital with Covid-19 of the colon -
dramatic when it started but tedious thereafter.
>
This thread hasn't gone all that well. John Larkin has ignored the fact
that I was talking about just the 3096. There have been some sensible
comments, but I'm still too sick to try and provide any kind of summing
up of the sensible bits.
>
-- Bill Sloman, Sydney
>
OK, we can defer discussing your one-shot circuit until you feel
better. I've had some medical adventures of my own.
>
My sympathies to both of you, coincidentally I am just getting back on my
feet after an eight day common cold from hell (was not Covid)
>
I'm now wearing a 24-hour recording EKG thing. It's really no trouble
at all. Pretty cool technology.
>
And they have been around for at least thirty years. My mother got stuck with being a guineau pig for one some thirty years ago.
>
It's a pity that there is no low-drama equivalent for blood pressure
You do have to compress the upper arm.
>
 FYI if you want to avoid getting covid again, it appears to be pretty much exclusively airborne, so you probably won't get infected if you (and your family if any) wear a respirator that fits you well, every time you are indoors with people not from your household
The best way of not getting Covid is to get vaccinated against it, and I've done that in spades. Wearing a face mask cuts the odds even further.
I probably got infected at my brother's house, when I was having dinner there with his wife and a cousin from half-way across Australia. My grand-niece who showed up briefly during the evening was the most likely vector - she's certainly infected her grandmother in the last couple of years.
Getting paranoid about getting infected isn't a realistic option.
<snip>
 I haven't been sick at all since 2019, unless you count hangovers or headaches from staying up too late. The main downside is that I can't eat inside restaurants, so I order take-away instead. That seems like a good deal to me, but others have different priorities from which I will not attempt to dissuade them at present.
This was my first dose of Covid. Because it got to my gut, it was fairly dramatic, and somewhat debilitating, but it looks as if I'm going to survive.
--
Bill Sloman
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Norton antivirus software.
www.norton.com

Date Sujet#  Auteur
13 Jun 24 * Fast monostable with a transistpor array35Bill Sloman
14 Jun 24 +* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array26Edward Rawde
14 Jun 24 i+- Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array1Edward Rawde
14 Jun 24 i`* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array24john larkin
14 Jun 24 i `* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array23Edward Rawde
14 Jun 24 i  `* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array22john larkin
14 Jun 24 i   +* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array11Edward Rawde
14 Jun 24 i   i`* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array10john larkin
14 Jun 24 i   i +* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array4Edward Rawde
14 Jun 24 i   i i`* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array3john larkin
14 Jun 24 i   i i `* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array2Edward Rawde
14 Jun 24 i   i i  `- Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array1john larkin
14 Jun 24 i   i `* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array5bitrex
15 Jun 24 i   i  +* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array3john larkin
15 Jun 24 i   i  i`* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array2john larkin
15 Jun 24 i   i  i `- Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array1Phil Hobbs
15 Jun 24 i   i  `- Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array1Edward Rawde
14 Jun 24 i   +- Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array1Gerhard Hoffmann
14 Jun 24 i   +* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array7piglet
14 Jun 24 i   i`* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array6Edward Rawde
14 Jun 24 i   i `* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array5john larkin
14 Jun 24 i   i  `* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array4Edward Rawde
15 Jun 24 i   i   `* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array3john larkin
15 Jun 24 i   i    `* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array2Edward Rawde
15 Jun 24 i   i     `- Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array1john larkin
15 Jun 24 i   `* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array2legg
15 Jun 24 i    `- Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array1Edward Rawde
18 Jun 24 `* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array8Bill Sloman
18 Jun 24  +* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array6john larkin
18 Jun 24  i`* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array5piglet
18 Jun 24  i `* Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array4john larkin
19 Jun 24  i  `* Re: Fast monostable with a transistor array3Bill Sloman
23 Jun15:16  i   +- Re: Fast monostable with a transistor array1john larkin
24 Jun04:48  i   `- Re: Fast monostable with a transistor array1Bill Sloman
18 Jun 24  `- Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array1Edward Rawde

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal