Re: Ambient temperature control

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: Ambient temperature control
De : '''newspam''' (at) *nospam* nonad.co.uk (Martin Brown)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 01. Jul 2024, 12:24:29
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v5u3le$1209c$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 01/07/2024 02:14, Don Y wrote:
Assuming you can keep a device in its "normal operating (temperature)
range", how advantageous is it (think MTBF) to drive that ambient
down?  And, is there a sweet spot (as there is a cost to lowering the
temperature)?
There can be for some high performance low level OPamps. Deliberately running them as cold as is allowed helps take the LF noise floor down and by more than you would predict from Johnson noise. ISTR there was a patent for doing this back in the 1980's. Prior to that they tended to heat the front end to obtain temperature stability and low drift.
https://ppubs.uspto.gov/dirsearch-public/print/downloadPdf/4883957
Made possible with the advent of decent solid state TECs.
 Also, is there any advantage to minimizing the hysteresis between
the ACTUAL operating temperature extremes in such a control strategy
(given that lower hysteresis usually comes at an increased cost)?
Depends how temperature sensitive the thing is that you are protecting. The example I recall they were aiming for medium term stable 6 sig fig measurements with the lowest possible noise.
--
Martin Brown

Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Jul 24 * Ambient temperature control20Don Y
1 Jul 24 +* Re: Ambient temperature control2Bill Sloman
1 Jul 24 i`- Re: Ambient temperature control1John R Walliker
1 Jul 24 +* Re: Ambient temperature control6Martin Brown
1 Jul 24 i+* Re: Ambient temperature control3Don Y
2 Jul 24 ii`* Re: Ambient temperature control2legg
2 Jul 24 ii `- Re: Ambient temperature control1Don Y
1 Jul 24 i`* Re: Ambient temperature control2Phil Hobbs
2 Jul 24 i `- Re: Ambient temperature control1Bill Sloman
1 Jul 24 `* Re: Ambient temperature control11legg
1 Jul 24  +* Re: Ambient temperature control4john larkin
2 Jul 24  i`* Re: Ambient temperature control3legg
2 Jul 24  i `* Re: Ambient temperature control2john larkin
3 Jul 24  i  `- Re: Ambient temperature control1legg
1 Jul 24  `* Re: Ambient temperature control6Don Y
2 Jul 24   `* Re: Ambient temperature control5legg
2 Jul 24    `* Re: Ambient temperature control4Don Y
3 Jul 24     `* Re: Ambient temperature control3legg
3 Jul 24      `* Re: Ambient temperature control2Don Y
5 Jul 24       `- Re: Ambient temperature control1legg

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal