Sujet : Re: Ambient temperature control
De : legg (at) *nospam* nospam.magma.ca (legg)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 01. Jul 2024, 15:34:46
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <k4f58j1r7hr7is2eq1rb4tspurt4ive8fe@4ax.com>
References : 1
User-Agent : Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 18:14:32 -0700, Don Y
<
blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:
Assuming you can keep a device in its "normal operating (temperature)
range", how advantageous is it (think MTBF) to drive that ambient
down? And, is there a sweet spot (as there is a cost to lowering the
temperature)?
>
If all you're thinking of is MTBF, adding the complexity of an active
cooling element is a big step in the wrong direction for the system.
Reducing the thermal impedance of the source, to ambient is the
usual way to go, when addressing a specific aging factor.
https://ve3ute.ca/2000a.htmlIf you're thinking of performance, It's cheaper and more reliable
to concentrate on reducing the temperature of the point source, not
the rest of the planet.
RL