Liste des Groupes | Revenir à se design |
On 7/1/2024 7:54 AM, Martin Brown wrote:It still puts quite hard limits on how small a device can observe the Earth even with diffraction limited optics. Monitoring radio traffic is much easier if the frequency is such that it escapes.And, probes don't ave to "pass through"; there's no reason they can't*We* can't (yet) travel interstellar distances in single lifetimes>
but I'm sure anyone with technology comparable to ours would be able to
*detect* our presence (given that we seem to make no attempt at "hiding")
The Fermi paradox of why aren't they here yet is somewhat tricky to explain. Our star is nothing like the oldest it could be so there are potentially technological societies that are billions of years ahead of us - plenty of time for robotic probes to visit anywhere in the galaxy.
sit and watch (if you have advanced technology, what limits might that
overcome on designing durable products?)
Indeed and remote sensing is getting very good now. I expect that someone will find a planet with evidence of an industrial atmosphere within the next century or so (maybe sooner).I suspect that unless there is some clever shortcut using physics we don't yet know about human inter stellar travel is just a pipe dream.But you don't need to *go* somewhere to know that it exists *or* what
it is like. We've visited Mars without ever having set foot, there.
Ditto the depths of the oceans.
We can make educated assessments as to the suitability for "life"That can be fraught with difficulties. I expect life as reproducing photosynthetic slime is extremely common anywhere that is stable enough to allow a billion years of reactions. Aqueous environment might not be strictly necessary but most other things have solid phases that sink.
in places that we could never expect to actually visit. Or,
discover some form of life and then set upon trying to sort out how
to communicate with same.
_If the Universe Is Teeming with Aliens ... WHERE IS EVERYBODY?_ gives some[snip]
interesting takes on the Fermi paradox.
They may have done but there are still hard limits on how big an antenna must be to obtain signal that is above the background noise floor.It takes industrial scale manufacture before CFCs would be visible from afar. SF6 is another common one but it's scale height works against seeing it high in the atmosphere (its molecule is rather heavy).But you (we) are still constrained by your knowledge of physical sciences
(and "interstellar civilizations"). Who's to say that "they" haven't
identified some other observable (by THEM) characteristic of civilization?
There are a whole slew of questions that you have to consider before youEncounters between species with advanced technology don't usually end well for the ones still in the iron age when they come up against automatic weapons. If we ever meet alien space travellers we had better hope that they are friendly. Even so their advanced technology could wreak unintentional havoc.
even worry about "how" to detect (or signal to) other civilizations.
- how much (effort/cost) do you want to detect them?
- how much do THEY want to be detected?
- how can they evade detection (assuming they actively don't want to be found)?
- how much do YOU want to be found?
- what might the consequences of such a detection be? (e.g., _Remembrance..._
posits an extinction level consequence)
Adams's claim that "Space is big" can also be accompanied by "Time is LONG".Space is mind bogglingly *BIG* the gaps between stars are huge.
Do these conspire for or against discovery (or being discovered)?
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.