Liste des Groupes | Revenir à se design |
On 5/07/2024 1:43 am, alan_m wrote:You seem to be living in cloud cuckoo land. Being upside down, all your blood has run to your head making your thought processes sub-optimal.On 04/07/2024 15:53, Bill Sloman wrote:The point of detecting that the cable had been cut would mean that any alarm generated wouldn't be false. You seem to have missed that.On 5/07/2024 12:07 am, alan_m wrote:>On 04/07/2024 14:23, Joe wrote:>On Thu, 4 Jul 2024 13:46:59 +1000>
Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:
>
>
>and it's not hard to embed a sense>
wire loop in the cable assembly that can generate an alarm as soon as
the cable is cut.
>
No engineer would do that, knowing that it would be wastage of time and
materials. Nobody would pay any attention to an alarm, least of all the
police. We're not living in the twentieth century now.
The car alarm in a public place is the most ignored warning :)
But with 5G phone links and artificial intelligence, the alarm can be sent to places where it will get attention, not that you'd know anything about that.
And who do you think is going to come out to the millions of false alarms, and how fast?
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.