Sujet : Re: July 4 fireworks in San Francisco
De : bill.sloman (at) *nospam* ieee.org (Bill Sloman)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 09. Jul 2024, 11:26:11
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v6j387$1biti$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 9/07/2024 5:39 am, john larkin wrote:
On Mon, 8 Jul 2024 14:22:56 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
On 7/8/2024 10:46 AM, john larkin wrote:
On Thu, 04 Jul 2024 22:00:46 -0700, john larkin
<jlarkin_highland_tech> wrote:
>
>
https://www.dropbox.com/s/n0unsqu6gd5qsdq/SF_Fireworks.mp4?dl=0
>
This is hilarious
>
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx02ykx5wp5o
>
The first pic, some BBC Climate Change heat wave, is overlooking
downtown San Francisco. She is not even wearing a sweater!
>
It's warm this morning, 57F at 8 AM. It's going to be a scorcher.
>
>
>
>
Well it's almost as if injecting X billion tons of CO2 into the
atmosphere per year has induced some fashion of "greenhouse effect."
The plants love it.
So you keep on claiming, but if you raise the CO2 level in the atmosphere, plants reduce the number of stomata in their leaves so that they can get the same amount of CO2 while losing less water (which they have more trouble getting).
CO2 isn't the only nutrient that plants depend on, and it is the one they find easiest to get.
-- Bill Sloman, Sydney-- This email has been checked for viruses by Norton antivirus software.www.norton.com