Re: OT: EV Charging Stations Stripped of Copper Cables

On Sat, 13 Jul 2024 14:11:36 +1000, Bill Sloman wrote:

On 13/07/2024 3:02 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:

On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 17:32:47 +1000, Bill Sloman wrote:
 

On 11/07/2024 10:32 am, john larkin wrote:

On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 23:04:00 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
<cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>

On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 10:48:09 -0700, john larkin wrote:
>

On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 17:18:23 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
<cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>

On Tue, 09 Jul 2024 06:52:49 -0700, john larkin wrote:
>

On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 09:24:30 -0000 (UTC), RJH <patchmoney@gmx.com>
wrote:
>

On 9 Jul 2024 at 05:04:24 BST, Bill Sloman wrote:

 
<snip>
 

Given a graph of usefulness vs expertise, some fields have a peak
pretty soon and then drop off.

>
John Larkin's grasp of what is actually useful is down there with
Cursitor Doom's. He's certainly no more capable of understanding what
climate scientists are telling us than Cursitor Doom is.
>
John Larkin did get a science degree from Tulane, but he was pre
selective about the bits he paid attention to, and climate science
wasn't an area where he paid any attention.

 
The 'climate scientists' are being paid to lay on the doom as thickly
as possible. Their 'research' is heavily compromised. That's why I
prefer data from *before* this area became politicized, but I wouldn't
expect you to understand that, Bill.

 
This is just one more of your demented conspiracy theories. If you knew
a bit more you'd be aware that the area didn't get "politicised" until
the late 1990's when there had been enough anthropogenic global warming
for it show up over the natural variation form effects like the El
Nino/La Nina alternation and the slower Atlantic Multidecal Oscillation.
 
Because you don't understand this, you ignore all climate science
observations since the very crude work from the 1890's.
 
Climate scientists have always been academics, and they publish
primarily for other academics. In the last twenty years, the media has
has publicised their work, adding in their own preference for finding
sensational implications in the published data (not always correctly).
 

There's no cause for alarm and CO2 at ~400ppm is harmless. Its levels
are the same now as when Lincoln was president, despite all the
pollution pumped out during the 20th century.

 
Wrong.
 
https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends/
 
https://capegrim.csiro.au/
 
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

Yeah, yeah. I've seen all that CRAP. The NASA site's the same; all
spouting the same complete nonsense as directed by your pal, Klaus Schwab
(who fancies himself as some sort of Bond villain) and his cronies.
Do some proper, reference book-based research for a change and you'll see
a completely different picture emerge.