Liste des Groupes | Revenir à se design |
On Sat, 13 Jul 2024 14:18:40 +1000, Bill Sloman wrote:<snip>
On 13/07/2024 3:21 am, john larkin wrote:On Fri, 12 Jul 2024 17:02:30 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
<cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 17:32:47 +1000, Bill Sloman wrote:
>On 11/07/2024 10:32 am, john larkin wrote:On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 23:04:00 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
<cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 10:48:09 -0700, john larkin wrote:
>On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 17:18:23 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
<cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>On Tue, 09 Jul 2024 06:52:49 -0700, john larkin wrote:
>On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 09:24:30 -0000 (UTC), RJH
<patchmoney@gmx.com>
wrote:
>On 9 Jul 2024 at 05:04:24 BST, Bill Sloman wrote:
Not a widely shared delusion.There are *no* "greenhouse gases" in our atmosphere, you damn fool.CO2 is not pollution. It is plant food that keeps us alive. More would>
be great.
CO2 does serve as plant food, along with water, sun light and a bunch of
minerals. Give plants more CO2 and they have fewer stomata in their
leaves, so that they can get the same amount of CO2 while losing less
water.
>
It's also a greenhouse gas, and more of it generates global warming,
which isn't great. Calling it pollution is odd, but more of it does
cause problems.
Granted there are on other planets in our solar system, but not Earth. So,It may be clear to you, but your idea of "clarity" looks like terminal confusion to anybody with working brain.
which planet are *you* on with your greenhouse gases, Bill? It clearly
isn't this one.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.