Re: Intel

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: Intel
De : alien (at) *nospam* comet.invalid (Jan Panteltje)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 07. Aug 2024, 07:07:25
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <v8v2uu$t9h9$1@solani.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : NewsFleX-1.5.7.5 (Linux-5.15.32-v7l+)
On a sunny day (Tue, 06 Aug 2024 08:42:21 -0700) it happened John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote in
<eug4bjlhks38sueertg0ro5rij5v0uk01e@4ax.com>:

On Tue, 06 Aug 2024 05:54:51 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:
>
On a sunny day (Mon, 05 Aug 2024 09:30:50 -0700) it happened John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote in
<tuu1bj9bvd05ru71a219scdql4fp0nijq4@4ax.com>:
>
On Mon, 05 Aug 24 16:10:54 UTC, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
>
On 8/5/2024 11:26 AM, John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 05 Aug 24 04:42:24 UTC, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
 
On 8/3/2024 5:47 PM, John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 03 Aug 2024 17:18:33 -0400, Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net>
wrote:
>
On Sat, 03 Aug 2024 12:32:23 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote:
>
https://www.nextplatform.com/2024/08/02/the-resurrection-of-intel-will-take-more-than-three-days/?td=rt-3a
>
Looks like they wrecked Altera.
>
And hung onto the Intel '86 architecture a tad too tightly, for far
too long.
>
Joe Gwinn
>
Yes, it's an ancient dog. It's immensely complex to push the X86
architecture for speed, hence the power consumption and all the bugs.
>
>
This poor bugger:
>
<https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/1ehjuzj/i_bought_700k_worth_of_intel_stock_today/>
>
 
Since its peak in 2024, Intel stock has lost 2/3 of its value.
 
 
 
>
About 1/3rd of that in the past 3 days..
>
Sorry, I meant 2022.
>
Intel is like Kodak and Polaroid and Xerox, fixated on their own aging
technology. Intel missed the boat big-time on EUV, so it's hilarious
that they project big revenues in the foundry business.
>
Intel has done $152 billion in stock buybacks, instead of investing in
their own business. Now they need government subsidies.
>
https://www.commondreams.org/opinion/intel-subsidy-chips-act-stock-buyback
>
Markets..
My Intel core I5 laptop is still much much faster than my ARM based Raspberry Pi4 8 GB
And even my old AMD 64 PCs are...
>
I do not realy like ARM architecture.
>
But things are changing" what's his name? just sold large parts of his Apple stock:
>
https://www.theguardian.com/business/article/2024/aug/03/berkshire-hathaway-warren-buffett-sells-off-apple-increases-cash-holdings
>
>
Writing bloat to sell more hardware is a silly game.
As silly as 'very old saying Archie? 'Do not fix it if it is not broken'
We had, at one time, a few guys doing 'preventive maintenance'
on electronic equipment in the studio.
Well some interesting fault finding required after that, my boss got stuck...
I fixed it in 10 minutes the next morning, the 'preventive maintenace' group had not properly tighened a PL259 connector,
ground screen was loose
interference impulses everywhere (was fast tacho pulse cable).
>
US financial system, dollar value, I think the old plan was to inflate the debt away.
But grabbing Iranian oil could pay some US debt.
Follow the money
So have that notanyyahoo provoke as much war as possible to create a reason to invade Iran, sell more weapons,
even maybe go as far as to get Russia on line give it YouCrane
Its all games US plays.
This time it will not work, too many real nukes everywhere, US is so small, take a globe and look the ratio of noise the US
makes versus the rest of the world. compared to surface area..
Russia China Pakistan India all have their nukes... Probably some more N Korea...
Invade Iran for some silly lie, like George Double You Booooooos did for weapons of mass destruction that did not really exist
in Iraq
more war crmes, Japan nuking, Afganistan, Korea, just a weapon manufacturer tha tUS is, and it even kills its own peole with
thsoe all the time.
Criminal, genocide, no matter what.
And crap weapons it makes, there are people here protesting against the horrible noise the F35 makes that we bougt (our CIA
controlled polly ticksians did)
What a piece of shit that F35
Should not be a problem to wipe out that US .
:-)
>
 
>
A lot of countries are buying F35s.

Lots of countries are using MS windows and US security updates that then messed up their airlines....
Lots of people eat junkfood and die young.

When that F35 shit passes over here (I am just a few miles from a mil airport) you
can neither have a phone conversation, or listen to TV or radio.
In a previous world war Germany detected enemy aircraft by the sound those made.
A few dollar electret mike setup would ridicule that F35 'stealth' sales crap.
A shot of RF reflecting paint by an agent or drone would make that F35 visible all over the place.
F16 was a reasobale good plane, US making war in - and EU sending its F16s to YouCrane and
then buying F35 is that NATO US weapon sales agency's game.


:-)
 

Date Sujet#  Auteur
3 Aug 24 * Intel43John Larkin
3 Aug 24 `* Re: Intel42Joe Gwinn
3 Aug 24  +* Re: Intel30John Larkin
3 Aug 24  i+* Re: Intel4Phil Hobbs
4 Aug 24  ii`* Re: Intel3Gerhard Hoffmann
4 Aug 24  ii `* Re: Intel2Dimiter_Popoff
5 Aug 24  ii  `- Re: Intel1Don Y
5 Aug 24  i`* Re: Intel25John Larkin
5 Aug 24  i `* Re: Intel24John Larkin
6 Aug 24  i  +* Re: Intel21Jan Panteltje
6 Aug 24  i  i+* Re: Intel17Bill Sloman
6 Aug 24  i  ii`* Re: Intel16Jan Panteltje
6 Aug 24  i  ii +* Re: Intel3John Larkin
7 Aug 24  i  ii i+- Re: Intel1Jan Panteltje
17 Aug 24  i  ii i`- Re: Intel1Bill Sloman
7 Aug 24  i  ii `* Re: Intel12Bill Sloman
7 Aug 24  i  ii  `* Re: Intel11Jan Panteltje
7 Aug 24  i  ii   `* Re: Intel10Bill Sloman
7 Aug 24  i  ii    `* Re: Intel9Jan Panteltje
7 Aug 24  i  ii     `* Re: Intel8Bill Sloman
7 Aug 24  i  ii      `* Re: Intel7Jan Panteltje
8 Aug 24  i  ii       `* Re: Intel6Bill Sloman
8 Aug 24  i  ii        `* Re: Intel5Jan Panteltje
10 Aug 24  i  ii         `* Re: Intel4Bill Sloman
12 Aug 24  i  ii          `* Re: Intel3brian
12 Aug 24  i  ii           `* Re: Intel2John Larkin
12 Aug 24  i  ii            `- Re: Intel1Phil Hobbs
6 Aug 24  i  i`* Re: Intel3John Larkin
7 Aug 24  i  i +- Re: Intel1Bill Sloman
7 Aug 24  i  i `- Re: Intel1Jan Panteltje
6 Aug 24  i  `* Re: Intel2bitrex
6 Aug 24  i   `- Re: Intel1John Larkin
4 Aug 24  `* Re: Intel11Don Y
4 Aug 24   `* Re: Intel10TTman
4 Aug 24    +* Re: Intel3John Larkin
4 Aug 24    i`* Re: Intel2Joe Gwinn
4 Aug 24    i `- Re: Intel1John Larkin
4 Aug 24    `* Re: Intel6Don Y
4 Aug 24     `* Re: Intel5piglet
4 Aug 24      +- Re: Intel1Don Y
4 Aug 24      `* Re: Intel3Edward Rawde
4 Aug 24       +- Re: Intel1John Larkin
4 Aug 24       `- Re: Intel1Don Y

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal