Sujet : Re: yes!
De : jlarkin_highland_tech (at) *nospam* nirgendwo (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 15. Aug 2024, 03:40:35
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <5dqqbjhjhaj104mse48gvou5gp9he96fil@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 21:26:12 -0400, "Edward Rawde"
<
invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
"john larkin" <jlarkin_highland_tech> wrote in message news:7hiqbjh28hchoc94jgf0p0vj4uafbgeemc@4ax.com...
On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 20:07:56 -0400, Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net>
wrote:
>
On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 16:55:01 -0700, john larkin
<jlarkin_highland_tech> wrote:
>
>
<https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a61854962/quantum-entanglement-consciousness/>
>
Back when Penrose made this proposal, nobody had the slightest idea
how brains worked. We now know a far bit more, and while the whole
story is not yet known, entanglement may be happening, but is simply
unneeded.
>
>
>
Joe Gwinn
>
Consciousness needs a lot of explaining.
>
>
Perhaps you should attend this:
https://www.newscientist.com/science-events/conscious-mind/
>
Two great mysteries are quantum mechanics and consciousness. Maybe
they are the same thing.
It's hilarorious that one big argument against our brains being
quantum mechanical is that QM only happens at liquid helium
temperatures.
yes!
Re: yes!