Re: yes!

On 18/08/2024 2:31 am, john larkin wrote:

On Sat, 17 Aug 2024 12:14:51 -0400, "Edward Rawde"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
 

"john larkin" <jlarkin_highland_tech> wrote in message news:dta1cj1f3pudq93ard2o2ve4dadero917e@4ax.com...

On Sat, 17 Aug 2024 06:26:27 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:
>

On a sunny day (Fri, 16 Aug 2024 15:07:52 -0700) it happened john larkin
<jlarkin_highland_tech> wrote in <06jvbjp36khao0m5ot65a1o1krricoasre@4ax.com>:
>

It's just code.

>
Not any more it isn't.

>
Those giant computer networks don't run code?
>

Your lack of understanding is a handicap.

>
Your lack of imagination ditto.

>
Well, there is a bit of your lack of understanding

>
So you understand how brains work?

>
Why is it necessary to understand how brains work?
>
I don't know much about AlphaGo.
I doubt it can explain how it works.
But it obviously does work.
>

>
Where are images stored,

>
Who cares?
Likely they are distributed throughout a brain in ways that it is not necessary for anyone or anything to understand.

 
Ignorance is appealing.

>
As you persistently remind us.
>

But electronic design - our topic here - benefits from both
imagination and understanding.

>
Not that you've got much of either.
>

I find it helpful, when designing things, to have a working model of
how my brain works.

>
It would be more helpful if you realised how badly your brain works.
>

What have you designed lately? Tell us about it.

>
You first. You do seem to think that you design circuits, but you don't
tell us about them in the kind of way that suggests that you actually
designed them.