Sujet : Re: yes!
De : invalid (at) *nospam* invalid.invalid (Edward Rawde)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 20. Aug 2024, 04:52:49
Autres entêtes
Organisation : BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com)
Message-ID : <va13ui$ns5$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
"john larkin" <jlarkin_highland_tech> wrote in message
news:lc38cj9muvd5tgdd0drskj8r7f6uh8v2a8@4ax.com...On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 23:08:55 -0400, "Edward Rawde"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
"john larkin" <jlarkin_highland_tech> wrote in message news:ta18cjhuee9ck91fl5qoqmjlf0bkquq1lf@4ax.com...
On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 22:31:53 -0400, "Edward Rawde"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
"john larkin" <jlarkin_highland_tech> wrote in message news:4mt7cjdnqt4i601lvdsrtivbg4iucgfuj4@4ax.com...
On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:48:36 -0400, "Edward Rawde"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
"john larkin" <jlarkin_highland_tech> wrote in message news:r7m6cjtpei82u2kg6a7g40r07okju99v5n@4ax.com...
On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:21:55 +1000, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
>
On 19/08/2024 3:26 am, john larkin wrote:
On Sun, 18 Aug 2024 15:33:38 +1000, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
>
On 18/08/2024 2:31 am, john larkin wrote:
On Sat, 17 Aug 2024 12:14:51 -0400, "Edward Rawde"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
"john larkin" <jlarkin_highland_tech> wrote in message news:dta1cj1f3pudq93ard2o2ve4dadero917e@4ax.com...
On Sat, 17 Aug 2024 06:26:27 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:
>
On a sunny day (Fri, 16 Aug 2024 15:07:52 -0700) it happened john larkin
<jlarkin_highland_tech> wrote in <06jvbjp36khao0m5ot65a1o1krricoasre@4ax.com>:
>
...
>
>
I only got a couple of pages in AoE3,
>
Which pages?
>
Around 360.
>
>
Ok since posting the question I discovered that you're mentioned on pages xxx, 294, 360, 524
>
Bill Sloman should probably not read page 360.
>
>
His whining centers on my inability to explain how I design
electronics, or where ideas come from.
>
Not sure I agree but I don't speak for him.
>
>
Sorry, I don't know. It just happens. If invention happened from
definable algorithms, everything would be invented all at once.
>
I think that's a bit like saying that a program which implements the quadratic formula solves all quadratics all at once.
>
>
>
>
One of the things I have learned is to stay confused for a while,
stagger around in the solution space for a few days at least.
Sounds reasonable to me. And it applies to any form of art.
Here's a silly example.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p3yN7YjJWVI>
Too many engineers dislike uncertainty, so they lock down a design,
preferably a textbook-sanctioned design, asap so they can implement.
>
Back when I used to read magazines like this one
https://www.worldradiohistory.com/Practical_Electronics.htmI particularly liked "Ingenuity Unlimited" because it gave lots of examples of how to do things.
Much like AoE does.
yes!
Re: yes!