Sujet : Re: OT: Search tricks?
De : joegwinn (at) *nospam* comcast.net (Joe Gwinn)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 22. Aug 2024, 00:00:30
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <l4sccj5fb3l8i5moevi0cftdsh8mb3ioi7@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 15:26:35 -0700, Don Y
<
blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:
On 8/21/2024 1:10 PM, Jeroen Belleman wrote:
On 8/21/24 21:57, Don Y wrote:
Is there some secret handshake to coerce *etail* sites to pay closer attention
to your search criteria? It seems like they produce results that match ANY
of your terms instead of ALL. [...]
Exactly.
I tried that. They'll take the intended logical operator as yet
another search term and show you *more* undesired results.
You have to phrase and punctuate it correctly.
I wasn't thinking of an explicit *operator* as much as careful grouping.
E.g.,
"stainless steel" "2 gang" "wall plate"
to match all variants of those *three* phrases -- and NOT:
wall plate
OR two gang
OR stainless steel
(OR stainless OR steel OR two OR gang OR wall OR plate...)
>
Idiots.
>
They obviously think more folks will spend extra time trying to settle
for something than moving on.
And they're probably right, because if it didn't usually lead to a
sale, they would stop trying to deflect people with decoys. I'm sure
they have tested all manner of approaches, and the present one won.
Joe Gwinn