Sujet : Re: 200V at 10mA
De : jlarkin_highland_tech (at) *nospam* nirgendwo (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 22. Aug 2024, 15:43:21
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <82jecjl5ld6vqbcrat74j92qn2fsu706ae@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Thu, 22 Aug 2024 10:27:43 -0000 (UTC), piglet
<
erichpwagner@hotmail.com> wrote:
john larkin <jlarkin_highland_tech> wrote:
On Thu, 22 Aug 2024 10:36:27 +0100, piglet <erichpwagner@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On 21/08/2024 17:39, Edward Rawde wrote:
SYMATTR InstName C5
If you want to stick with that way-over-complex design you could look
into versapac 6 windings coupled inductors.
I would not even try that circuit. Better to redesign to use either a
single inductor or a dual coupled inductor like DRQ127 series. if
necessary follow with a cockcroft-walton multiplying rectifier.
UC3843 control chip would be ideal, cheap, reliable, easy to use,
multisourced.
piglet
I like the auto-flyback circuit, flyback drive into the center tap of
a DRQ127. Then maybe a voltage doubler to harvest the p-p swing.
And LTC3803 rocks.
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/8jwi35owo41lfmonc8y92/LTC3803.jpg?rlkey=l3thy5h4533sxpd152ve24c26&raw=1
>
Very slick part but LT/AD usually too luxurious pricewise for me. The
UC384x is slow and old but tenth the cost. I like the 5V reference output
can often support a low power MCU etc
True about the price. Our stuff isn't very price sensitive.
TI has some great little switchers lately. We're paying 21 cents for
the TPS562208DDCT spread-spectrum synchronous buck switcher.
I wonder if it would be practical to use one of those to make the
12/200 volt converter. That's just possible. Let's play with that
idea.
Unfortunately, it's a nuisance to plug the TI models into LT Spice.