Sujet : Re: Small batch SMT tools?
De : pcdhSpamMeSenseless (at) *nospam* electrooptical.net (Phil Hobbs)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 24. Aug 2024, 23:33:05
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vadn31$1ift4$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
john larkin <jlarkin_highland_tech> wrote:
On Sat, 24 Aug 2024 20:51:56 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs
<pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
john larkin <jlarkin_highland_tech> wrote:
On Sat, 24 Aug 2024 17:07:08 -0000 (UTC), Ian
<${send-direct-email-to-news1021-at-jusme-dot-com-if-you-must}@jusme.com>
wrote:
On 2024-08-24, john larkin <jlarkin_highland_tech> wrote:
It's crazy that, starting from the earliest days of ICs, you can make
a mistake by rotating a part. You couldn't plug in a tube wrong.
Challenge accepted :)
And they used the tube convention of counting pins counter-clockwise,
which actually doesn't make much sense for ICs.
Theyre clockwise looking at the bottom, proving once again that dead bug
is the One True Prototyping Style. ;)
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
Cruelty to invertibrates. You should be ashamed.
If you solder a surfmount part to an adapter, do you mount all that
upside down?
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/6pfssxz68ay8t64yh6xag/Z356_SN2.JPG?rlkey=o89t5tjsxh31264zbsirjin47&raw=1
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ydvcds95zvzjq56bzeimr/Z412_Proto.JPG?rlkey=hyejukxbbnk3573engf0if4zt&raw=1
I should try that. ;)
I use SOT and SOIC packages upside down, but they’re fiddlier than DIPs and
TO92s.
Fortunately I invested in a lot of those a few years ago, when the Great
TO92 Purge started. I should be good for the next century or so. ;)
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
-- Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant ElectroOptical Innovations LLC /Hobbs ElectroOptics Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics