Re: Instead scopes

On 30/08/2024 12:16 am, john larkin wrote:

On Thu, 29 Aug 2024 06:55:15 -0700, john larkin
<jlarkin_highland_tech> wrote:
 

On Thu, 29 Aug 2024 05:46:54 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:
>

On a sunny day (Wed, 28 Aug 2024 09:32:58 -0700) it happened john larkin
<jlarkin_highland_tech> wrote in <mtjucjdqe2f91c2jsjp6011k0uvakuimog@4ax.com>:
>

On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 15:21:00 -0000 (UTC), Sergey Kubushyn
<ksi@koi8.net> wrote:
>

john larkin <jlarkin_highland_tech> wrote:

On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 04:28:02 -0000 (UTC), Sergey Kubushyn
<ksi@koi8.net> wrote:
>

john larkin <jlarkin_highland_tech> wrote:

On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 14:55:32 -0400 (EDT), Martin Rid
<martin_riddle@verison.net> wrote:
>

john larkin <jlarkin_highland_tech> Wrote in message:r

On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 10:40:15 -0400 (EDT), Martin Rid<martin_riddle@verison.net> wrote:>Anyone own the gds-1202b ?>>Any
good?>>$350 at tequipment>>CheersI haven't tried that one. We like the Rigols.I recently acquired a
Siglenthttps://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B06XZML6RD/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_search_asin_title?ie=UTF8&psc=1and gave it to one of my engineers. I'll ask him how he
likes it.It has an up-front DEFAULT button, which a digital scope needs to getyou out of nightmare states.

>
Other than the lack of software features,  the 200mhz bw for 350
dollars is intriguing.
>
Cheers

>
It sounds pretty good to me.
>
https://siglentna.com/wp-content/uploads/dlm_uploads/2020/02/SDS1000X-E_DataSheet_DS0101E-E04C.pdf
>
What's missing?
>
I like the 500 uV/div.

>
If you want to save the last penny, maybe. But you can get way better scope
for slightly more -- Rigol DHO800/DHO900. It is 12-bit, same 550uV/div, has
all standard serial protocols decoding, very light and compact, can work
from a battery with USB-C power connector, way better than that Siglent that
feels like relic next to those DHOs.

>
We use almost all Rigols at work. My slow bench scope is a 500 MHz
DS4034 (upgraded from 350 MHz)
>
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/ns08x686afbayjsw8c2ab/h?rlkey=iu4h89057t755pueg4ijnldbo&dl=0
>
and my fast scope is a Tek 11802 sampler.

>
I also have one, 11801C. Couple of SD-24s, SD-20, and SD-22 heads :)

>
At the original purchase price, adjusted for inflation, I must have
half a million dollars worth of sampling heads.
>
The color grading and jitter measurement is great on the 11801C, but
the old B+W screens photograph better.
>
I'll miss my 11802 when it eventually dies.
>
The TDR is great. I'm going to give my new kids a lecture on
transmission lines, and I'll show them some TDR.
>
It is apparently possible these days to get an EE degree and be
completely ignorant of transmission lines. Or even electricity.

>
oops!
>
Then what DO they know?

>
How to type c++

 One issue here is that it's cheaper and easier to teach coding, than
it is to teach electronics.
 I walked through the Cornell EE school. I saw about 25 computer
screens and one oscilloscope.

It's lot easier and quicker to bread-board a circuit in LTSpice than it is to wire up a test circuit, but what that means is that you need to make fewer real circuits and they are a lot more likely to work when tested.
That, on it's own, is enough to explain why labs look different today than they did in the dark ages.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney