Sujet : Re: Instead scopes
De : jl (at) *nospam* 650pot.com (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 30. Aug 2024, 00:44:10
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <sr12djdhbjvs0kin4bdaef2v1u7i1u0fr0@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Thu, 29 Aug 2024 19:15:29 -0400, Phil Hobbs
<
pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
>
On 2024-08-28 16:05, john larkin wrote:
On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 17:41:33 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs
<pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
Sergey Kubushyn <ksi@koi8.net> wrote:
john larkin <jlarkin_highland_tech> wrote:
On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 04:28:02 -0000 (UTC), Sergey Kubushyn
<ksi@koi8.net> wrote:
>
john larkin <jlarkin_highland_tech> wrote:
On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 14:55:32 -0400 (EDT), Martin Rid
<martin_riddle@verison.net> wrote:
>
john larkin <jlarkin_highland_tech> Wrote in message:r
On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 10:40:15 -0400 (EDT), Martin
Rid<martin_riddle@verison.net> wrote:>Anyone own the gds-1202b
?>>Any good?>>$350 at tequipment>>CheersI haven't tried that one. We
like the Rigols.I recently acquired a
Siglenthttps://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B06XZML6RD/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_search_asin_title?ie=UTF8&psc=1and
gave it to one of my engineers. I'll ask him how he likes it.It has
an up-front DEFAULT button, which a digital scope needs to getyou
out of nightmare states.
>
Other than the lack of software features, the 200mhz bw for 350
dollars is intriguing.
>
Cheers
>
It sounds pretty good to me.
>
https://siglentna.com/wp-content/uploads/dlm_uploads/2020/02/SDS1000X-E_DataSheet_DS0101E-E04C.pdf
>
What's missing?
>
I like the 500 uV/div.
>
If you want to save the last penny, maybe. But you can get way better scope
for slightly more -- Rigol DHO800/DHO900. It is 12-bit, same 550uV/div, has
all standard serial protocols decoding, very light and compact, can work
from a battery with USB-C power connector, way better than that Siglent that
feels like relic next to those DHOs.
>
We use almost all Rigols at work. My slow bench scope is a 500 MHz
DS4034 (upgraded from 350 MHz)
>
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/ns08x686afbayjsw8c2ab/h?rlkey=iu4h89057t755pueg4ijnldbo&dl=0
>
and my fast scope is a Tek 11802 sampler.
>
I also have one, 11801C. Couple of SD-24s, SD-20, and SD-22 heads :)
>
I don't have any relation to Rigol, just have DHO924S as a go-to scope on my
bench and DHO814 for use as an advanced multimeter wherever I need a
portable one. I like them and I can run them in a web browser if needed.
>
I bought the Siglent as a gift, and I was curious about it.
>
>
I do have an advanced LeCroy WR640Zi with all options for serious jobs -- it
is 40GS/s 4GHz bandwidth instrument with all features imaginable -- but I
rarely power it up. It makes a noise like a jet at takeoff (Rigol DHO is
very quite) and it is 8-bit so what you get on the screen looks ugly
comparing with 12-bit DHO. DHO924 covers 99% of real world debugging so
LeCroy is mostly gathering dust...
>
So is ours! It cost $50K. It doesn't make much sense and there is
basically no support. It doesn't make sense to them either.
>
Yep, all those features are nice but very rarely needed in the real life.
>
Next to my bench, I have a couple of TDS 784As, a TDS 694C, an 11801C, and
an 11802 that JL kindly donated when I went out on my own, lo these fifteen
years ago. Also several SD-14s and SD-24s, plus at least one of all the
other heads except the SD-32.
>
I use them all regularly.
>
My favorite is the 694C3GHz, 10GSa/s simultaneously on all four channels.
Its 50 ohms only, but I also have the matching 4GHz FET probes.
>
A 12-bit scope might be useful if the ENOB is anything like that, but I
have doubts, especially in a 250 MHz bandwidth.
>
Cheers
>
Phil Hobbs
>
Cheers
>
Phil Hobbs
The 3 GHz probe sampler, the SD14, is incredible. Its loading is close
to zero and in most cases it doesn't even need a ground clip on the
probe.
I have a couple of the SD32 (50 GHz) heads, if you need to do
something fast.
And one each of the SD42 and SD43 optical-input heads.
Yeah, I have one each of the 20 GHz SD-48 and SD-46, and two of the
slower (6 GHz) SD-42s. They're great except that they're blind north of
900 nm.
>
I also have an SD-51 trigger head, which is a tunnel diode gizmo that
improves the high-speed triggering, and an SD-20 loop-through head,
which lets you sample the input signal to some gizmo as well as its output.
>
The 2-meter extender cables are super useful because you can bring the
sampler to the gizmo rather than the other way round.
>
Cheers
>
Phil Hobbs
The extender cables cost more than the heads nowadays.