Re: Instead scopes

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: Instead scopes
De : bill.sloman (at) *nospam* ieee.org (Bill Sloman)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 02. Sep 2024, 14:28:43
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vb4eib$2rtvk$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 2/09/2024 8:37 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Mon, 2 Sep 2024 16:54:18 +1000) it happened Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vb3neq$1scn0$2@dont-email.me>:
 
On 2/09/2024 12:34 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Mon, 2 Sep 2024 01:56:13 +1000) it happened Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vb22qu$1hles$2@dont-email.me>:
>
On 1/09/2024 10:41 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Sun, 1 Sep 2024 21:38:47 +1000) it happened Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vb1job$1fp20$1@dont-email.me>:
>
On 1/09/2024 9:06 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Sun, 1 Sep 2024 17:45:46 +1000) it happened Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vb163a$1dt9b$1@dont-email.me>:
>
On 30/08/2024 2:21 am, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 30 Aug 2024 00:43:39 +1000) it happened Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vaq1f2$jdj$1@dont-email.me>:
>
<snip>
>
Explosion isn't quite the right concept. The universe is pictured as
starting off very small, very dense, and expanding rapidly, but it
created the space it expanded into  as it expanded.
>
Only in the imagination of mathematicians who are starting as kids to try to do a divide by nothing (zero)
and then create infinities such as black's holes.
>
You've got that backwards. Black holes are entirely finite, because they
contain enough mass to close space back in  on itself.
>
Sound like shit talk.
>
Which is to say you don't understand it, and resent having your
ignorance highlighted
>
In a Le Sage system there is a point where all LS particles are intercepted.
>
Pity about all the other defects in the Le Sage model.
>
Tip: there are no infinities in nature, something always will give way.
>
With black holes it's the curvature of space-time.
>
Space and time are not curved, matter is less compressed near a big mass that intercepts some
LS particles, making the pendulum longer and clocks slowing down.
>
That would be relevant is the Le Sage model could work. It can't.
>
Gravitational lensing demonstrates that space-tine is curved in the
vicinity of any mass - you need a lot of mass to get an observable
curvature,
>
The first big test of that prediction was made during the 1919 eclipse
of the sun.
>
https://earthsky.org/human-world/may-29-1919-solar-eclipse-einstein-relativity/
>
There have been plenty of others since then.
>
Same limits apply
>
It is simple.
>
If you ignore most of the data.
>
<snipped more ill-informed nonsense.>
 You need a brain-wash.
So I can end up as ill-informed as you are?
Somebody who believes what he reads in Russia Today has already been brainwashed, and you are complaining that I haven't been suckered by the   mis-information that you have swallowed, hook, line and sinker.
Though not even they are silly enough to have gone for the Le Sage theory of gravity.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

Date Sujet#  Auteur
27 Aug 24 * Instead scopes102Martin Rid
27 Aug 24 +* Re: Instead scopes5Martin Rid
27 Aug 24 i+* Re: Instead scopes3Phil Hobbs
29 Aug 24 ii`* Re: Instead scopes2wmartin
29 Aug 24 ii `- Re: Instead scopes1Phil Hobbs
27 Aug 24 i`- Re: Instead scopes1john larkin
27 Aug 24 +* Re: Instead scopes95john larkin
27 Aug 24 i`* Re: Instead scopes94Martin Rid
28 Aug 24 i `* Re: Instead scopes93john larkin
28 Aug 24 i  `* Re: Instead scopes92Sergey Kubushyn
28 Aug 24 i   `* Re: Instead scopes91john larkin
28 Aug 24 i    `* Re: Instead scopes90Sergey Kubushyn
28 Aug 24 i     +* Re: Instead scopes85john larkin
29 Aug 24 i     i+* Re: Instead scopes74Jan Panteltje
29 Aug 24 i     ii`* Re: Instead scopes73john larkin
29 Aug 24 i     ii +* Re: Instead scopes70john larkin
29 Aug 24 i     ii i+* Re: Instead scopes60Bill Sloman
29 Aug 24 i     ii ii+* Re: Instead scopes2john larkin
30 Aug 24 i     ii iii`- Re: Instead scopes1Bill Sloman
29 Aug 24 i     ii ii`* Re: Instead scopes57Jan Panteltje
29 Aug 24 i     ii ii +* Re: Instead scopes12john larkin
30 Aug 24 i     ii ii i`* Re: Instead scopes11Jan Panteltje
30 Aug 24 i     ii ii i `* Re: Instead scopes10john larkin
30 Aug 24 i     ii ii i  +* Re: Instead scopes2john larkin
31 Aug 24 i     ii ii i  i`- Re: Instead scopes1Bill Sloman
30 Aug 24 i     ii ii i  +* Re: Instead scopes5Bill Sloman
30 Aug 24 i     ii ii i  i`* Re: Instead scopes4john larkin
31 Aug 24 i     ii ii i  i `* Re: Instead scopes3Bill Sloman
31 Aug 24 i     ii ii i  i  `* Re: Instead scopes2john larkin
31 Aug 24 i     ii ii i  i   `- Re: Instead scopes1Bill Sloman
30 Aug 24 i     ii ii i  +- Re: Instead scopes1Jan Panteltje
31 Aug 24 i     ii ii i  `- Re: Instead scopes1Jan Panteltje
1 Sep 24 i     ii ii `* Re: Instead scopes44Bill Sloman
1 Sep 24 i     ii ii  +* Re: Instead scopes8Jan Panteltje
1 Sep 24 i     ii ii  i`* Re: Instead scopes7Bill Sloman
1 Sep 24 i     ii ii  i `* Re: Instead scopes6Jan Panteltje
1 Sep 24 i     ii ii  i  `* Re: Instead scopes5Bill Sloman
2 Sep 24 i     ii ii  i   `* Re: Instead scopes4Jan Panteltje
2 Sep 24 i     ii ii  i    `* Re: Instead scopes3Bill Sloman
2 Sep 24 i     ii ii  i     `* Re: Instead scopes2Jan Panteltje
2 Sep 24 i     ii ii  i      `- Re: Instead scopes1Bill Sloman
1 Sep 24 i     ii ii  `* Re: Instead scopes35john larkin
1 Sep 24 i     ii ii   +* Re: Instead scopes7Bill Sloman
1 Sep 24 i     ii ii   i`* Re: Instead scopes6john larkin
2 Sep 24 i     ii ii   i +* Re: Instead scopes2Jan Panteltje
2 Sep 24 i     ii ii   i i`- Re: Instead scopes1Jan Panteltje
2 Sep 24 i     ii ii   i `* Re: Instead scopes3Bill Sloman
2 Sep 24 i     ii ii   i  `* Re: Instead scopes2john larkin
3 Sep 24 i     ii ii   i   `- Re: Instead scopes1Bill Sloman
1 Sep 24 i     ii ii   +* Re: Instead scopes22Phil Hobbs
1 Sep 24 i     ii ii   i`* Re: Instead scopes21Joe Gwinn
1 Sep 24 i     ii ii   i `* Re: Instead scopes20john larkin
1 Sep 24 i     ii ii   i  `* Re: Instead scopes19Joe Gwinn
2 Sep 24 i     ii ii   i   +* Re: Instead scopes16john larkin
2 Sep 24 i     ii ii   i   i+- Re: Instead scopes1Jan Panteltje
2 Sep 24 i     ii ii   i   i+* Re: Instead scopes3Bill Sloman
2 Sep 24 i     ii ii   i   ii`* Re: Instead scopes2john larkin
3 Sep 24 i     ii ii   i   ii `- Re: Instead scopes1Bill Sloman
2 Sep 24 i     ii ii   i   i`* Re: Instead scopes11Joe Gwinn
2 Sep 24 i     ii ii   i   i +* Re: Instead scopes8Phil Hobbs
2 Sep 24 i     ii ii   i   i i`* Re: Instead scopes7john larkin
3 Sep 24 i     ii ii   i   i i +* Re: Instead scopes2Phil Hobbs
4 Sep 24 i     ii ii   i   i i i`- Re: Instead scopes1john larkin
3 Sep 24 i     ii ii   i   i i +* Re: Instead scopes3Bill Sloman
4 Sep 24 i     ii ii   i   i i i`* Re: Instead scopes2john larkin
5 Sep 24 i     ii ii   i   i i i `- Re: Instead scopes1Bill Sloman
3 Sep 24 i     ii ii   i   i i `- Re: Instead scopes1john larkin
2 Sep 24 i     ii ii   i   i `* Re: Instead scopes2john larkin
2 Sep 24 i     ii ii   i   i  `- Re: Instead scopes1Joe Gwinn
2 Sep 24 i     ii ii   i   `* Re: Instead scopes2john larkin
2 Sep 24 i     ii ii   i    `- Re: Instead scopes1Joe Gwinn
9 Sep 24 i     ii ii   `* Re: Instead scopes5piglet
9 Sep 24 i     ii ii    +* Re: Instead scopes3Jeroen Belleman
9 Sep 24 i     ii ii    i+- Re: Instead scopes1Liz Tuddenham
9 Sep 24 i     ii ii    i`- Re: Instead scopes1john larkin
9 Sep 24 i     ii ii    `- Re: Instead scopes1john larkin
29 Aug 24 i     ii i`* Re: Instead scopes9Jan Panteltje
29 Aug 24 i     ii i `* Re: Instead scopes8john larkin
29 Aug 24 i     ii i  `* Re: Instead scopes7Liz Tuddenham
31 Aug 24 i     ii i   `* Re: Instead scopes6john larkin
31 Aug 24 i     ii i    `* Re: Instead scopes5Phil Hobbs
31 Aug 24 i     ii i     `* Re: Instead scopes4john larkin
31 Aug 24 i     ii i      `* Re: Instead scopes3Phil Hobbs
31 Aug 24 i     ii i       +- Re: Instead scopes1ehsjr
1 Sep 24 i     ii i       `- Re: Instead scopes1john larkin
29 Aug 24 i     ii `* Re: Instead scopes2Jan Panteltje
29 Aug 24 i     ii  `- Re: Instead scopes1john larkin
29 Aug 24 i     i`* Re: Instead scopes10Bill Sloman
29 Aug 24 i     i `* Re: Instead scopes9john larkin
30 Aug 24 i     i  `* Re: Instead scopes8Bill Sloman
30 Aug 24 i     i   `* Re: Instead scopes7john larkin
31 Aug 24 i     i    `* Re: Instead scopes6Bill Sloman
31 Aug 24 i     i     `* Re: Instead scopes5john larkin
31 Aug 24 i     i      `* Re: Instead scopes4Bill Sloman
31 Aug 24 i     i       `* Re: Instead scopes3john larkin
1 Sep 24 i     i        +- Re: Instead scopes1Bill Sloman
1 Sep 24 i     i        `- Re: Instead scopes1Jan Panteltje
28 Aug 24 i     `* Re: Instead scopes4Phil Hobbs
28 Aug 24 i      `* Re: Instead scopes3john larkin
30 Aug 24 i       `* Re: Instead scopes2Phil Hobbs
30 Aug 24 i        `- Re: Instead scopes1john larkin
9 Sep 24 `- Re: Instead scopes1Joerg

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal