Sujet : Re: Instead scopes
De : bill.sloman (at) *nospam* ieee.org (Bill Sloman)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 02. Sep 2024, 14:28:43
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vb4eib$2rtvk$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 2/09/2024 8:37 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Mon, 2 Sep 2024 16:54:18 +1000) it happened Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vb3neq$1scn0$2@dont-email.me>:
On 2/09/2024 12:34 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Mon, 2 Sep 2024 01:56:13 +1000) it happened Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vb22qu$1hles$2@dont-email.me>:
>
On 1/09/2024 10:41 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Sun, 1 Sep 2024 21:38:47 +1000) it happened Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vb1job$1fp20$1@dont-email.me>:
>
On 1/09/2024 9:06 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Sun, 1 Sep 2024 17:45:46 +1000) it happened Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vb163a$1dt9b$1@dont-email.me>:
>
On 30/08/2024 2:21 am, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 30 Aug 2024 00:43:39 +1000) it happened Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vaq1f2$jdj$1@dont-email.me>:
>
<snip>
>
Explosion isn't quite the right concept. The universe is pictured as
starting off very small, very dense, and expanding rapidly, but it
created the space it expanded into as it expanded.
>
Only in the imagination of mathematicians who are starting as kids to try to do a divide by nothing (zero)
and then create infinities such as black's holes.
>
You've got that backwards. Black holes are entirely finite, because they
contain enough mass to close space back in on itself.
>
Sound like shit talk.
>
Which is to say you don't understand it, and resent having your
ignorance highlighted
>
In a Le Sage system there is a point where all LS particles are intercepted.
>
Pity about all the other defects in the Le Sage model.
>
Tip: there are no infinities in nature, something always will give way.
>
With black holes it's the curvature of space-time.
>
Space and time are not curved, matter is less compressed near a big mass that intercepts some
LS particles, making the pendulum longer and clocks slowing down.
>
That would be relevant is the Le Sage model could work. It can't.
>
Gravitational lensing demonstrates that space-tine is curved in the
vicinity of any mass - you need a lot of mass to get an observable
curvature,
>
The first big test of that prediction was made during the 1919 eclipse
of the sun.
>
https://earthsky.org/human-world/may-29-1919-solar-eclipse-einstein-relativity/
>
There have been plenty of others since then.
>
Same limits apply
>
It is simple.
>
If you ignore most of the data.
>
<snipped more ill-informed nonsense.>
You need a brain-wash.
So I can end up as ill-informed as you are?
Somebody who believes what he reads in Russia Today has already been brainwashed, and you are complaining that I haven't been suckered by the mis-information that you have swallowed, hook, line and sinker.
Though not even they are silly enough to have gone for the Le Sage theory of gravity.
-- Bill Sloman, Sydney