Sujet : Re: nuclear clock better then 'atomic' clock?? What's in a name...
De : jeroen (at) *nospam* nospam.please (Jeroen Belleman)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 05. Sep 2024, 09:11:30
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vbbotq$8po0$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0
On 9/5/24 07:20, Jan Panteltje wrote:
Major leap for nuclear clock paves way for ultraprecise timekeeping
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/09/240904130817.htm
September 4, 2024
Source:
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
Summary:
Nuclear clocks would measure time based on changes inside an atom's nucleus,
which would make them less sensitive to external disturbances and potentially
more accurate than atomic clocks.
These clocks could lead to improved timekeeping and navigation,
faster internet speeds, and advances in fundamental physics research.
Scientists have demonstrated key components of a nuclear clock,
such as precise frequency measurements of an energy jump in a thorium-229
nucleus.
future babble?
Paper is 25 dollars measured at today's nuclear inflation time, eh speed
I would have thought that NIST, financed by public money,
would publish their papers for free for thee.
You already mentioned this back in May. This is the follow-up we all
expected.
Jeroen Belleman