Sujet : Re: Visualizing
De : blockedofcourse (at) *nospam* foo.invalid (Don Y)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 06. Sep 2024, 19:38:28
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vbfi7e$tlhp$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2
On 9/6/2024 1:30 AM, Wanderer wrote:
Baloney. I don't think I really visualize things. I don't see things floating
in front of me.
If asked to visualize your spouse/offspring's faces, don't you conjure an
image? What about thinking about the ocean? Mountains? Is there nothing
*visual* that comes to mind?
If someone mention's the dentist's *drill*, can you not hear the high pitched
whine? Smell the collagen being ground up?
I feel it. Sort of like closing your eyes and feeling an object in
your hand. I know it from all angles, its insides and outsides, its texture,
its solidity, its weight... It's kind of the sculptor versus the painter but
that is the information a good painter is getting across in his painting. I don't
have problems with 3D puzzles. In high school, I had study class with the teacher
who taught remedial students. One day there were all these 3D puzzles out that
they used to test these kids cognitive ability. I walked over and solved them all
in a couple of minutes. I didn't realize I had done anything special. I thought
I just played with the toys. Until I turned around and saw the teacher staring at
me. A couple of them no one had been able to solve.
This was a common type of "IQ" test when I was young. A 2D representation
of 3D objects and you had to pick which of the offered choices represented the
"unseen side". You needed a sort of intuition to know the correct rendering
as exploring each option systematically would take too much time (tests
were always time-limited)
It's the same sort of skill that lets folks assemble items purchased in
an unassembled form.
Or, play chess.
For multithreaded and object-oriented software, it's an essential skill
as the interactions are more 3+ dimensional than, for example, simple
procedural programming languages.