Sujet : Re: Visualizing
De : invalid (at) *nospam* invalid.invalid (Edward Rawde)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 06. Sep 2024, 20:11:23
Autres entêtes
Organisation : BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com)
Message-ID : <vbfk4s$1dnk$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
"Don Y" <
blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote in message
news:vbfjh5$tlhp$5@dont-email.me...On 9/6/2024 11:56 AM, Edward Rawde wrote:
I think the issue there is what it means to visualize.
I can temporarily replace the image of this computer screen with an image of an apple on a plate.
I can even make the apple lift off the plate if I want.
Obviously none of this is happening in front of me.
There has been no change in what's in front of me and what's in front of me is still being processed (you might say
unconsciously).
I know this because I know I can safely drive a car while imagining floating apples.
>
I think that is too literal an interpretation.
>
Or, one should replace "visualize" with "imagine" as a more generic term
as it isn't as literally tied to a visual representation.
>
One can *imagine* what it's like to be in the elevator when someone *farts*!
>
So perhaps some people have no imagination.
I find it hard to believe that that can be literally true but maybe it can for some people.