Re: Phishing

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: Phishing
De : jlarkin_highland_tech (at) *nospam* nirgendwo (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 08. Sep 2024, 01:04:16
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <jdqpdj91vfciusj4hn5cj1b6eiqkibet9j@4ax.com>
References : 1
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Thu, 5 Sep 2024 12:11:24 -0700, Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid>
wrote:

I'm checking my "deflected" incoming mail to see if anything that
*should* have been allowed through was mistakenly diverted
(false positive).
>
I see a fair number of phishing attempts on my "public" accounts.
But, all are trivially identified as such.
>
So, how is it that folks (organizations) are so often deceived
by these things?  Are users just lazy?  Would it be more helpful
to have mail clients make it HARDER to activate an embedded
URL or "potentially compromised" attachment?
>
Or, will the stupidity of users adapt, accordingly?

I've noticed that I get very little spam or phishing on Saturday or
Sunday. Do bots get the weekend off?


Date Sujet#  Auteur
5 Sep 24 * Phishing18Don Y
6 Sep 24 +* Re: Phishing3john larkin
7 Sep 24 i`* Re: Phishing2legg
7 Sep 24 i `- Re: Phishing1john larkin
6 Sep 24 +* Re: Phishing4Don Y
7 Sep 24 i`* Re: Phishing3Edward Rawde
7 Sep 24 i `* Re: Phishing2Don Y
7 Sep 24 i  `- Re: Phishing1Edward Rawde
7 Sep 24 +* Re: Phishing7Joerg
8 Sep 24 i`* Re: Phishing6Don Y
9 Sep 24 i `* Re: Phishing5Joerg
9 Sep 24 i  +* Re: Phishing3Don Y
9 Sep 24 i  i`* Re: Phishing2Joerg
10 Sep 24 i  i `- Re: Phishing1Don Y
10 Sep 24 i  `- Re: Phishing1ehsjr
8 Sep 24 `* Re: Phishing3john larkin
9 Sep 24  `* Re: Phishing2Joerg
10 Sep 24   `- Re: Phishing1john larkin

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal